You Ask, I Answer: What About New AI Experts?

Chris asks, “Does it bother you that so many people are now AI experts all of the sudden?”

In this video, I talk about the growing number of people claiming to be AI experts overnight. While some may see this as a negative, I actually think it’s a good thing. As someone who has been working in machine learning and artificial intelligence for over a decade, I believe the increased interest and visibility of the field is beneficial. More people using and understanding these tools can only lead to better results. Of course, there will be some “snake oil salesmen” who claim to be experts but don’t have the actual knowledge or expertise. However, this creates an opportunity for those with actual expertise to shine and clean up the messes left by the wannabes. So, don’t let the abundance of so-called experts discourage you from exploring the potential of AI. And if you’re unsure whether someone really knows what they’re doing, start asking specific questions about what could go wrong. A real expert will be able to give you detailed answers about your specific use case. Thanks for tuning in, and if you enjoyed this video, please hit that subscribe button.

https://youtu.be/NkfjG5z_zQM

Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.

Listen to the audio here:

Download the MP3 audio here.

Machine-Generated Transcript

What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.

In today’s episode, Chris asks, Does it bother you that so many people are now quote, AI experts all the sudden? No.

And here’s why.

I’ve been working in machine learning and artificial intelligence for about a decade now a little bit more than a decade.

2012 was when I really started getting interested in data science in machine learning, the our programming language, etc.

And in that time, it’s been an uphill battle, trying to explain to people what artificial intelligence is, why they might need it, what it can do for them.

And adoption has been slow.

adoption has been challenging to get people to recognize that the technology delivers better results, and that they can use those results.

When you have stuff like ChatGPT, and Dolly and Stable Diffusion, etc, creating all these things, writing, copy, making images, composing music, etc.

That’s, that’s a good thing, right? That’s a good thing.

We want people to use these tools, we want people to understand what these tools can do for them.

And yeah, are there a lot of people who are, you know, claiming to be AI experts and ChatGPT experts overnight.

And, you know, all these companies, startups doing large language models, of course, there’s a lot, there’s tons of them, there’s a lot of opportunity there.

It’s what we’ve been saying for 10 years, there’s a lot of opportunity here, when you have kind of this gold rush mentality.

It’s a good thing for everybody, because it creates more visibility, right? talking to somebody about attribution modeling, and Markov chains and such like that.

That doesn’t really get anyone excited, right? It’s very complex math, telling somebody, Hey, this machine can write a blog post for you.

They understand that they understand that they get it, they see what it can do for them.

And will you have a lot of snake oil salesmen that pop up when you have some a new field of technology? Of course, of course, we had tons of podcasting experts come out of the woodwork in the early days of podcasting.

Remember, all those folks telling you what exact microphone, Dubai and all these different things.

And most of them were flash in the pan folks that just kind of vanished over time, we had no shortage of SEO experts and webmasters back in the day, we had no shortage of crypto experts and NF T experts back in the day.

And now we have no shortage of AI experts who may or may not have any expertise.

But the conversation that shattered the awareness is good for everybody, right? We want people to be trying this stuff, we want people to be adopting it and implementing it.

And this is the part that I think is probably the most reassuring for people who have actual expertise.

The definition of an expert, my definition of an expert, is someone who knows what will go wrong.

An expert is someone who knows what will go wrong, so that they can avert it, or mitigate it, or deal with the consequences.

When you have a lot of snake oil salesmen rushing into a space, you know, kind of reminds me of the the ongoing joke.

What do you call an aerobics instructor, someone who’s taken one class more than everyone else in the class, you have a lot of folks like that in the AI space now who don’t have actual expertise.

And that’s okay.

Because, again, it creates visibility, and it creates opportunity.

And the opportunity is this.

Those who don’t have expertise, when they tried to convince somebody or try to lead somebody through a complex project involving artificial intelligence, things will go wrong.

And when those things go wrong, if you don’t have expertise, yet tend to make a pretty big mess of things.

Right, you tend to do things pretty badly.

And if you have actual expertise, you can mitigate some of these harms upfront.

And more importantly, when you run into somebody who’s like, ah, you know, we tried doing this AI thing with this other person.

And he didn’t really work out, you can ask them very specific questions, say, Well, did this happen? Did this happen that is, Did this happen? And like, oh, yeah, this is, these are all things that went wrong.

And like, how do you know like, well, it’s what people who actually know what they’re doing would would do about it.

We see this all the time with things like Google Analytics, where someone who’s a Google Analytics expert, but not really goes in and makes a hash of things and then you come in and like well, okay, here’s the five things that they did really wrong.

This is setup backwards, fix this here, change this attack manager, and you’re fine, right? And so the fakes, I would call them fakes because they do have some knowledge just not very much.

The wannabe experts create a lot of opportunity for the real experts to clean up their messes.

And because of that, you can often you can awful often bill more, you know, if somebody Commission’s a model for for usage and you know, charge them a quarter million dollars and the model just doesn’t do what they want it to say like yeah, I can either try to return the model you’ve got or we can just start from ground up, but it’s going to cost you half a million dollars to do at this time.

Now, in the long term, is that bad? Yes, in some ways, because it can, it can scorch some of the Earth, right? There’ll be people who will try an AI project with a want to be expert, and be turned off by like, Nope, didn’t work.

For us, it was a failure, etc, not realizing it’s not the technology to follow is the person who’s leading through the technology.

But the field overall because it is on solid ground, because it is backed up by real science and real expertise isn’t going anywhere.

So eventually, those folks might be persuaded to give it another try.

But for the rest of the folks who know what they’re doing, it’s a good thing.

We want more eyes on the space.

Because we want people to benefit from these tools and do cool stuff.

Right? So doesn’t bother me that there are so many, quote, AI experts.

in relatively short order, people will figure out who knows what they’re doing and who doesn’t, based on the things that will or won’t go wrong.

If you would like to avert this, when you’re talking to an AI expert, and you’re not sure whether they have expertise or not, start asking them questions about the things that will go wrong, right.

And you’ll, for real experts, you will get some very, very specific questions back about your use case about what it is that you’re trying to do.

And then you’re gonna start getting really technical questions, right? Show me your data set.

What kinds of tuning have you done in the data set? What kinds of detection for anomalies are in the data? What kinds of biases are in the data? And you’ll spend a lot of time hearing about your training data set, you’ll spend a lot of time hearing about what model choice, what application, what API you’re going to use.

And that’s when you know, you’ve crossed over from hey, here’s a cool ChatGPT prompt to Oh, okay, this is the this is real enterprise software.

That’s where the rubber meets the road is in the implementation of complex systems, and all the things that go wrong.

So it’s a really good question.

And I can definitely see where there will be times in places where people with real expertise are like, Well, I’ve been working at this for 10 years.

And why is this guy over here? Who is hogging? You know, cryptocurrencies last week? Why is he getting all the limelight? I can totally get what that comes from.

But at the same time, if there was no interest in the guy over there, Hawking, cryptocurrencies is now Hawking AI solutions, that would mean that the market still wasn’t ready for us, right still isn’t ready to even have the conversation.

And if it takes the guy selling snake oil to open some doors, maybe that’s his purpose.

Right? Maybe that’s his role in the AI revolution.

Who knows? Anyway, really good question.

complex question, kind of a, a loaded question, but a good one nonetheless.

Thanks for watching.

If you’d like this video, go ahead and hit that subscribe button.


You might also enjoy:


Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:

subscribe to my newsletter here


AI for Marketers Book
Get your copy of AI For Marketers

Analytics for Marketers Discussion Group
Join my Analytics for Marketers Slack Group!