Almost Timely News: When Should You Use Generative AI? (2023-06-25) :: View in Browser
Content Authenticity Statement
92% of this newsletter was generated by me, the human. AI generated content appears in the first section in the form of two images and a paragraph of text.
Watch This Newsletter On YouTube 📺
What’s On My Mind: When Should You Use Generative AI?
Today, let’s talk about when to use or not use generative AI to create content. There are three sets of factors we need to consider to make this decision.
First, is the effort AI-assisted or AI-led? This makes a difference – is the final product ultimately made by humans or machines?
Second, is the task at hand generative or comparative? Generative AI – both large language models that power tools like ChatGPT and image tools like Stable Diffusion – are better at one versus the other.
Third, is the content being created a commodity or is it premium?
These are the three tests. Let’s explore what each means.
AI-Assisted Versus AI-Led
This first test is fairly straightforward. AI-assisted content is when you ask an AI model to help you create, but you, the human, are ultimately the creator. Examples of AI-assisted content would be things like writing an outline, brainstorming, giving suggestions, asking advice, etc. AI is the helper, and you are the do-er.
AI-led content is content in which the machine’s output is a substantial part of the final product. Examples of AI-led content would be writing a detailed prompt that the machine creates a blog post for, or creating a series of images used in a slide deck, or writing a jingle that you use in a video. You are the supervisor and AI is the worker, but the final product is largely the worker’s product.
Why does this distinction matter? The main reason here is intellectual property. Laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; in the USA where I’m based, the US Copyright and Patent Office has ruled that AI-led content is ineligible for copyright. Copyright only applies to works created by humans – a precedent set in Naruto v Slater in 2018.. If the planned content is intended to be valuable – meaning you would enforce intellectual property rights if someone else copied it – then your work should be AI-assisted instead of AI-led.
Here’s a simple example, to disambiguate this. If you ask a tool like Google Bard or ChatGPT to write you an outline for a blog post about marketing, and then you write the blog post, the finished work is human-led. AI may have assisted with the ideas, but ideas are ineligible for copyright anyway. The final work is human-made, and thus can be copyrighted and protected.
If you give ChatGPT an outline and tell it to write the blog post, the finished work is AI-led – and that means it is ineligible for copyright. A competitor or some rando on the Internet could take the work in whole and copy paste it to their blog with no consequences because that work is not protected, at least under USA law.
So, that’s the first test.
Generative Versus Comparative
The second test is what kind of work you’re asking AI to do. In general, today’s generative AI tools are much better at comparative efforts than generative efforts. What does this mean? In my talk on AI, I outline 6 categories of tasks generative AI (specifically large language models, but some of it does apply to image and audio generation as well) are good at: summarization, extraction, rewriting, classification, question answering, and generation.
Under the hood, when you strip away all the fancy words and all the hype about AI, these models are nothing more than prediction engines. Yes, with extremely large datasets, they exhibit interesting emergent behaviors like some degree of mathematical reasoning and other tests of logic, but these behaviors are simply the results of very large probability computations. When you type a prompt into ChatGPT or Midjourney, you are fundamentally just asking the model to predict the next thing you want it to do – the next word in the sequence, the next pixel in the image.
Generative AI models, therefore, perform two fundamental types of operations, comparative and generative. Generative is when we ask for the next thing – the next word in a sentence, the image from a description, etc. Every time you ask one of these models to make something net new, you are doing generation. Comparative tasks are when we give the model a word and ask it to compare it to what it predicts, or to take a series of words, look them up in its probability tables, and then highlight only the most important probabilities. In image work, it’s when we ask a model to do inpainting, or to recolor something, or remove an object from the image.
Why do models do better with comparative efforts than generative efforts? Because there’s fundamentally less predicting. When you do comparisons, you’re providing most, if not all of the data. If I ask a model to summarize this issue of the newsletter, I’m providing all the materials, and all it has to do is score each word, compare it to its internal probabilities database, and return only a certain number of those probabilities. It doesn’t have to make anything up.
In human terms, this is the difference between writing and editing. Which is easier for you – to get out a red pen and light a document on fire with it, or to stare at the gaping abyss of a blank page and a blinking cursor? Many folks find editing easier, at least to get started, because there’s already something to work with, even if it’s not very good.
Machines are better at editing tasks – summarization, extraction, rewriting, and classification – than they are at generating. That’s just the way the models work. Prompts for editing – “summarize this article in 50 words or less” – can be much, much shorter than prompts for writing, because the machine doesn’t need to predict anything new. It just needs to compare what’s already there with what it knows.
So, that’s the second test. If you’re facing a task that’s editing, AI is usually a great choice. If you’re facing a task that’s creating, AI might still be a good choice, but it’s going to be more effort to get a good result from it – better prompts, more iterations, etc.
Commodity Versus Premium
The last test we have to ask is whether or not what we want to create is commodity content or premium content. Commodity content is content that isn’t particularly special. It should communicate what we want to communicate, but the value it provides isn’t in the way it’s crafted. Premium content is content that is special, that is valuable, that requires something like subject matter expertise or substantial skill to produce, and that premium has value.
Again, because machines are fundamentally just predicting off known probabilities, what they create is mathematically an average of what they’ve been trained on. As a result, they will always produce content that is inherently average. How good the content is depends on how specific the prompt is; the more specific and detailed your prompt, the more creative your work will be because it’s an average of a smaller amount of data.
So, what’s the difference between commodity content and premium content? Commodity content is exactly what it sounds like: content that’s a commodity, that’s common, that’s nothing special. Here’s an example:
Suppose I told you that this is a photo I took in my hotel room of a painting on the wall. Is that believable? Of course. Hotel rooms are filled with images like this sailboat, or this pitcher of flowers:
It’s tasteful, inoffensive art that may or may not move you, but it does the job of breaking up the vast emptiness of a hotel room wall.
Is it valuable? Is it impactful? Does it move you? If you saw this painting in your hotel room and you knew you wouldn’t get caught, would you steal it for your own home?
Probably not. It’s not terrible, but it’s not amazing.
And you wouldn’t know – or care – whether it was made by a person or a machine. To be clear, both of these are machine-generated – and you probably couldn’t tell the difference if I put them in a hotel room.
This is the essence of commodity content. It’s content that’s just okay. It’s content that doesn’t require a lot of care per se. We generate commodity content all day long, when we write emails to each other, when we post a memo in the office about not microwaving fish in the common area microwave, when we sit down and assemble our grocery list.
Premium content, on the other hand, is content that requires serious effort, serious thought, serious expertise. It’s content that we know has value, has significance, has meaning to us. It’s content that is uniquely ours and has to communicate very specific details in the way that only we can do.
I asked ChatGPT, using the GPT-4 model, to write up the same points of view that I’ve just written above. Here’s what it had to say about commodity versus premium content:
Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, is the value of the content. AI can generate volumes of content quickly, but quantity does not always equate to quality. For high-stakes content, such as keynote speeches, brand positioning statements, or crisis communication, the subtle nuances and deep understanding of human emotion that a skilled copywriter brings to the table are irreplaceable.
This is factually correct, but it lacks… well, me. It lacks my voice, the unique way I communicate, and presumably at least part of the reason you read this newsletter in the first place.
So this is the third test for when to use AI: the closer you are to premium content, the less you should use AI. Can it help you brainstorm or critique what you’ve created? Sure. Should you have it write for you? With anything that requires deep skill or knowledge, probably not, at least not with today’s models.
Apply the Three Tests
So, that’s the three questions I’d ask before using generative AI for any content task. How important is it that the result be copyrightable? How much of the task is comparative versus generative? And how premium is the resulting content?
Having AI craft diplomatic replies to random inbox pitches? Great use of AI. It’s totally a commodity task, copyright isn’t an issue, and even though it’s generative, quality doesn’t matter after a certain point. Once it’s factually correct, grammatically sound, and inoffensive, it’s good enough.
Having AI write your wedding vows? Maybe not.
Having AI paint the decor for your hotel rooms? It depends on how important that artwork is to the customer experience. If you’re like every other hotel I’ve stayed at, AI is probably the way to go. But if you want to use art as a differentiator for your customer experience, then probably not.
Got a Question? Hit Reply
I do actually read the replies.
Share With a Friend or Colleague
If you enjoy this newsletter and want to share it with a friend/colleague, please do. Send this URL to your friend/colleague:
ICYMI: In Case You Missed it
Besides the newly-refreshed Google Analytics 4 course I’m relentlessly promoting (sorry not sorry), I recommend the short, totally free YouTube video tutorial on setting up Google Analytics 4 menus to mirror those of Universal Analytics. It’ll help make the transition easier for folks who aren’t accustomed to the new interface.
- How to Make Universal Analytics-Style Menus in Google Analytics 4
- Mind Readings: The Future of AI Models
- You Ask, I Answer: How to Make AI More Energy Efficient?
- Mind Readings: The Danger of Old Text in Generative AI
- Almost Timely News: The Importance of Open Source in AI
- Mind Readings: Large Language Model Censorship Reduces Performance
- Mind Readings: What Will Make Or Break Spatial Computing
- Mind Readings: What I’m Paying Attention To In AI
- So What? Launching a podcast – podcast marketing tactics
- Now With More Illegal Fireworks!
Skill Up With Classes
These are just a few of the classes I have available over at the Trust Insights website that you can take.
- ⭐️ The Marketing Singularity: How Generative AI Means the End of Marketing As We Knew It
- Powering Up Your LinkedIn Profile (For Job Hunters) 2023 Edition
- Measurement Strategies for Agencies
- Empower Your Marketing With Private Social Media Communities
- Exploratory Data Analysis: The Missing Ingredient for AI
- How AI is Changing Marketing, 2022 Edition
- How to Prove Social Media ROI
- Proving Social Media ROI
- Paradise by the Analytics Dashboard Light: How to Create Impactful Dashboards and Reports
Get Back to Work
Folks who post jobs in the free Analytics for Marketers Slack community may have those jobs shared here, too. If you’re looking for work, check out these recent open positions, and check out the Slack group for the comprehensive list.
- Analytics Architect at Search Discovery
- Analytics Engineer (Remote) at Selfbook
- Data Scientist, Marketing Analytics at Etsy
- Director Of Demand Generation ($175,000/Year Usd), Gigster Hq at Gigster
- Senior Data Scientist, Marketing Analytics at Etsy
- Senior Manager Of Digital Analytics at Eighty Five Sixty, Inc.
- Sr. Copywriter at AmerisourceBergen Global Careers
- Sr. Director / Vp Of Digital Communities at GreenBiz Group
- Vice President Of Media + Connection Strategy at Collective Measures
- Vice President, Demand Generation (Remote) at Appfire
- Vp Of U.s. Strategy at Code.org
Advertisement: Bring My AI Talk To Your Company
I’ve been lecturing a lot on large language models and generative AI (think ChatGPT) lately, and inevitably, there’s far more material than time permits at a regular conference keynote. There’s a lot more value to be unlocked – and that value can be unlocked by bringing me in to speak at your company. In a customized version of my AI keynote talk, delivered either in-person or virtually, we’ll cover all the high points of the talk, but specific to your industry, and critically, offer a ton of time to answer your specific questions that you might not feel comfortable asking in a public forum.
Here’s what one participant said after a working session at one of the world’s biggest consulting firms:
“No kidding, this was the best hour of learning or knowledge-sharing I’ve had in my years at the Firm. Chris’ expertise and context-setting was super-thought provoking and perfectly delivered. I was side-slacking teammates throughout the session to share insights and ideas. Very energizing and highly practical! Thanks so much for putting it together!”
Pricing begins at US$7,500 and will vary significantly based on whether it’s in person or not, and how much time you need to get the most value from the experience.
What I’m Reading: Your Stuff
Let’s look at the most interesting content from around the web on topics you care about, some of which you might have even written.
Social Media Marketing
Media and Content
- YouTube Provides Insights Into Key Consumption Trends via Social Media Today
- Content Marketing vs. PR: Why Youve Been Thinking About It All Wrong Advertising Week
- Measurement Roundtable: How to Handle Disinformation via Institute for Public Relations
SEO, Google, and Paid Media
- 5 Ways Marketers Are Using AI To Boost SEO & Content Marketing
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) / Pagespeed Insights via Local Search Forum
- The 4 Types of Keywords ( Examples)
Advertisement: Google Analytics 4
Believe it or not, July 1st, 2023 – and Google’s shutdown of Universal Analytics in favor of Google Analytics 4 – is in less than THIRTEEN calendar days. This means that in THIRTEEN days, you will no longer be able to capture data in Universal Analytics – it will just stop collecting data. If you haven’t already switched over, it’s urgent you do so right now. So, let’s get you moving.
Tools, Machine Learning, and AI
- AI for Business: Use Cases and Trends
- OpenAI Considers ‘App Store’ For ChatGPT
- Hugging Face CEO tells US House open-source AI is ‘extremely aligned’ with American interests via VentureBeat
Analytics, Stats, and Data Science
- Data Labeling Improves Machine Learning & AI Efficiency
- Decoding Glassdoor: NLP-driven Insights for Informed Decisions
- Time-Series Forecasting Using Attention Mechanism
All Things IBM
- How generative AI can help finance and accounting professionals via IBM Blog
- Re-invent your warranty process with a digital twin via IBM Blog
- IBM says quantum processors are beginning to provide utility beyond classical methods via TechSpot
Dealer’s Choice : Random Stuff
- What Analytical Chemistry Can Tell Us About Coca Cola’s Recipe
- How streaming services like Netflix, Max lost their promise – Los Angeles Times
- Booze and Blowens Cop The Lot – Fourteen Lines
Advertisement: Ukraine 🇺🇦 Humanitarian Fund
The war to free Ukraine continues. If you’d like to support humanitarian efforts in Ukraine, the Ukrainian government has set up a special portal, United24, to help make contributing easy. The effort to free Ukraine from Russia’s illegal invasion needs our ongoing support.
How to Stay in Touch
Let’s make sure we’re connected in the places it suits you best. Here’s where you can find different content:
- My blog – daily videos, blog posts, and podcast episodes
- My YouTube channel – daily videos, conference talks, and all things video
- My company, Trust Insights – marketing analytics help
- My podcast, Marketing over Coffee – weekly episodes of what’s worth noting in marketing
- My second podcast, In-Ear Insights – the Trust Insights weekly podcast focused on data and analytics
- On Twitter – multiple daily updates of marketing news
- On LinkedIn – daily videos and news
- On Instagram – personal photos and travels
- My free Slack discussion forum, Analytics for Marketers – open conversations about marketing and analytics
Events I’ll Be At
Here’s where I’m speaking and attending. Say hi if you’re at an event also:
- MAICON, Cleveland, July 2023
- Content Jam, Chicago, September 2023
- ISBM, Chicago, September 2023
- Content Marketing World, DC, September 2023
- Marketing Analytics and Data Science, DC, September 2023
- MarketingProfs B2B Forum, Boston, October 2023
Events marked with a physical location may become virtual if conditions and safety warrant it.
If you’re an event organizer, let me help your event shine. Visit my speaking page for more details.
Can’t be at an event? Stop by my private Slack group instead, Analytics for Marketers.
Events with links have purchased sponsorships in this newsletter and as a result, I receive direct financial compensation for promoting them.
Advertisements in this newsletter have paid to be promoted, and as a result, I receive direct financial compensation for promoting them.
My company, Trust Insights, maintains business partnerships with companies including, but not limited to, IBM, Cisco Systems, Amazon, Talkwalker, MarketingProfs, MarketMuse, Agorapulse, Hubspot, Informa, Demandbase, The Marketing AI Institute, and others. While links shared from partners are not explicit endorsements, nor do they directly financially benefit Trust Insights, a commercial relationship exists for which Trust Insights may receive indirect financial benefit, and thus I may receive indirect financial benefit from them as well.
Thanks for subscribing and reading this far. I appreciate it. As always, thank you for your support, your attention, and your kindness.
See you next week,
Christopher S. Penn
You might also enjoy:
- Transformer les personnes, les processus et la technologie - Christopher S. Penn - Conférencier principal sur la science des données marketing
- How to Measure the Marketing Impact of Public Speaking
- How To Set Your Consulting Billing Rates and Fees
- Understand the Meaning of Metrics
- How I Think About NFTs
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers