Maria asks, “Is there anything specific that worries you about the impact of AI for content/marketing, etc?”
Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.
Listen to the audio here:
- Take my new Generative AI course!
- Got a question for You Ask, I'll Answer? Submit it here!
- Subscribe to my weekly newsletter for more useful marketing tips.
- Subscribe to Inbox Insights, the Trust Insights newsletter for weekly fresh takes and data.
- Find older episodes of You Ask, I Answer on my YouTube channel.
- Need help with your company's data and analytics? Let me know!
- Join my free Slack group for marketers interested in analytics!
What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.
Christopher Penn 0:13
In today’s episode, Maria asks, is there anything specific that worries you about the impact of AI for content or marketing, etc? worries me.
Um, there’s a few things that are concerns.
First and foremost is intellectual property, a lot of the law around AI doesn’t exist yet, when a machine creates content, who owns it? Right now, the precedent that has been set thus far is that if a piece of software generates some sort of output, because you are the operator of the software, it is your intellectual property, right? You open up Microsoft Word, yeah, type of document out, and then you’ve created this thing, and it is yours.
However, when you use something like the DaVinci model for text generation, or stable diffusion, you are still involved in the process, you were still pushing the Go button, but the machine is doing more of the work.
So then the question becomes, does the model itself, get some credit, in the same way that say, an undergrad student in your lab would get credit for their contributions to an academic paper, we don’t have answers to this yet, I suspect we will not have answers to this for at least a little while, because it’s not clear.
The machines themselves cannot create content by themselves.
Right? If you turn on stable diffusion, load all the libraries and stuff, it just sits there, it doesn’t do anything, right.
It’s like a, it’s like a blender, you buy a blender, plug it into the wall, you can even put ingredients in it.
But unless a human pushes the button to make the blender go, nothing happens.
The same was true of AI systems, nothing happens about human inputs.
So if I as the human condition, the environment and push the Go button, is the intellectual property mind.
Again, current precedent says that software doesn’t necessarily create intellectual property humans do.
And that machine can’t own a patent, a machine amp can’t own a copyright a human or an entity run by humans, like a corporation can.
Who knows? We don’t know the answer to that.
So for now, we operate as though you the human are responsible for that.
So that’s one aspect.
The second aspect that is, it doesn’t worry me, but it is a concern is that you have this bar of competence, right? The bar of competence is where the machines are versus where you are.
Maybe you’re a below average writer.
And for the last four years, machines have been far below average, right? They crank the crank a word salad today, they’re below average writers write, in certain circumstances that actually even are why we call them average writers, mediocre writers, which means they’re above you now in terms of competence.
And as time goes on, those machine models will keep getting better and better and better.
And so for us, the humans, we have to keep getting better and better and better as well, so that we stay ahead of that bar of competence.
That’s getting harder to do for a lot of people.
And so, one of the things we have to take into consideration is, at what point do we become just the conductors of the orchestra? Right? For something like painting? I’m a terrible painter.
My, my first inclination would be to use something like stable diffusion, if I wanted to create some kind of art, because it’s better than I am, right? I’m bad at it.
So it’s better than me.
So what happens as writing becomes better than me or videography becomes better than me, I have to use these tools.
I have to change how I work to incorporate these tools so that maybe, instead of me doing the painting, I’m writing the prompt that creates the painting and fine tuning it that way.
Christopher Penn 4:35
Again, it’s not a worry right now.
It is more something I’m watching very carefully.
How fast is the bar of competency rising with machines? How far is it compared to humans? And are the humans who are going to be impacted? Are they paying attention to it? Are they taking advantage of the time that they have now to level up their skills? So that At they can they can be more effective and not be replaced by machines really good question there’s a lot more to unpack in here but really good question thanks for asking if you’d like this video go ahead and hit that subscribe button
You might also enjoy:
- Transforming People, Process, and Technology
- Almost Timely News, December 31, 2023: Three Words and Four Enemies of 2024
- Can Causation Exist Without Correlation? Yes!
- Do People Use Social Media During the Holidays?
- Almost Timely News, November 19, 2023: A Deep Dive on Prompt Libraries
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers