In today’s episode, I discuss the controversial Zoom AI policy change. I explain why companies want proprietary data for competitive advantage. I advise asking customers permission and offering incentives over unilateral Terms of Service changes. Tune in to hear my full analysis of this important AI ethics situation.
Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.
Listen to the audio here:
- Take my new Generative AI course!
- Got a question for You Ask, I'll Answer? Submit it here!
- Subscribe to my weekly newsletter for more useful marketing tips.
- Subscribe to Inbox Insights, the Trust Insights newsletter for weekly fresh takes and data.
- Find older episodes of You Ask, I Answer on my YouTube channel.
- Need help with your company's data and analytics? Let me know!
- Join my free Slack group for marketers interested in analytics!
What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.
In today’s episode, Helena asks, What do you make of the zoom AI kerfuffle? So for those who are not familiar zoom, the company that makes the ubiquitous video conferencing software changes terms of service to say they would use customer data to train their language models to train generative AI.
This of course created a quite the firestorm of people saying was a violation of their privacy and so on and so forth.
Zoom then retracted that policy and altered to be exactly the opposite actually to say from now on we’re not going to use customer data to train our AI.
This raises a much bigger issue for pretty much every company, pretty much every company, but especially companies that are in the tech space that provide tech services are scrambling to have and find and gather up unique data sources.
Here’s why most of the large language models that are out there, like open AI is models like the llama family from Facebook, etc.
These models are all trained on public data, which means that there really isn’t a big competitive advantage for one company to use one model over another.
Right? If you were to take one of these models and tune it or train it on your company’s proprietary data, the data behind the scenes that could give you a competitive advantage, your model might be better at asking and answering the kinds of questions and content generations that are unique to your business unique to your way of doing things.
So it’s no surprise that we see companies like zoom and many others saying, hey, we’re going to do what we can to leverage the data we have access to, to make a model that works better for our specific use case.
You can think about in the video conferencing space, right? How many different companies there are in the video conferencing space? How many companies have all this transcription software of one kind or another? And could they use that knowledge base to get better transcription to answer questions to predict the topic of a call, and so on and so forth.
The company that leverages data the most smartly would be able to offer that as a service.
Now zoom kind of went out about it the wrong way.
The wrong way was just to make a change to the terms of service.
And, you know, does essentially force people into that policy.
That’s not a smart way of doing it.
And they found out the hard way that a lot of people really don’t like that.
The right way to do it is to acknowledge the value of the data.
If if you are running a piece of software, and you are collecting user data, and you want to leverage it, ask users to opt in and maybe offer them an incentive, right? Say like, hey, we charge, you know, $300 a month, we will knock 25 bucks off your fee every month if you opt into this plan that allows us to anonymize and use your data to train some kind of AI service.
That would be ethical.
That would be lawful, compliant with privacy policies.
And it gives users the choice to say like, what is my data worth? If I say, Hey, I think my data is worth more than 25 bucks a month, you don’t opt into it.
If you say, you know, 25 bucks is 25 bucks, I’ll take it.
Particularly if it’s maybe on a per seat basis, it might be considerable savings, say check the box.
Yes, I’m in.
This is going to become a bigger and bigger problem for everyone as AI continues to proliferate everywhere as everyone wants to have their secret sauce, their secret model, their secret library of training data that will improve the performance of foundation models.
And that’s really important.
Again, that you should expect this kind of strategic pivot, and not necessarily the way zoom did it.
But in general, a company is saying, you know what we need to get better at using this data, we need to get better at we need to get better at making use of the data to make our our AI smarter for our company and the companies that do that the best will have better AI that generates better results that creates competitive advantage.
So my thoughts on it, ask people ask for permission, maybe incentivize participation, definitely don’t do it just by forcing everyone into it that tends to never go well.
But recognize that everyone and anyone who is aware of the capabilities of AI is going to want to do that and may even need to do that.
Using customer data using proprietary data sooner rather than later.
Thanks for the question.
And thanks for tuning in.
Talk to you next time.
If you’d like this video, go ahead and hit that subscribe button.
You might also enjoy:
- Transforming People, Process, and Technology
- Vision, Mission, Strategy, Tactics, and Execution
- Do People Use Social Media During the Holidays?
- What's the Difference Between Social Media and New Media?
- How To Set Your Consulting Billing Rates and Fees
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers