In this episode of Mind Readings, some thoughts about our cadence of marketing and how it’s like striking a flint onto tinder to light a fire.
Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.
Listen to the audio here:
- Got a question for You Ask, I’ll Answer? Submit it here!
- Subscribe to my weekly newsletter for more useful marketing tips.
- Find older episodes of You Ask, I Answer on my YouTube channel.
- Need help with your company’s data and analytics? Let me know!
- Join my free Slack group for marketers interested in analytics!
Machine-Generated Transcript
What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.
Christopher Penn 0:15
In today’s mind reading, I had a thought the other day about sparks and fire.
Let’s say you’re trying to start a fire and you’ve got your Tinder and your kindling and your your wood and you’re ready to go.
How are you going to start that fire? What’s? What’s the easiest way to start that fire? Suppose you have something like a flint and Tinder, right? You have a knife and little stone you scrape against that and you get some sparks to fly onto your Tinder how successful will you be? If you take out your knife, right? And you strike your your Flint once you get a few sparks to land on on your Tinder? Not very, I mean, you might get lucky, you might starve a little bit of a fire.
But on the other hand, if you can’t, if you have a, you know, Tinder and you’re just repeatedly Whack, whack, whack getting lots and lots of sparks.
How quickly will you start a fire much more quickly, right? The more you strike your Flint, the more sparks you throw.
As long as they’re hot, the more likely it is you’ll get a fire started.
A product Okay, great, cool.
I don’t know how to start a fire.
What does this have to do with anything? When we think about our marketing, our content are the sparks.
Now, if they’re terrible, it’s terrible content, right? Like I have something here is inert like a fork instead of an actual Flint.
And I’m striking it nothing’s happening, right? Nothing’s happening, because it’s terrible.
And it just like if you have a terrible content, no matter how often you strike, or how hard strike and if it’s terrible content, you get no sparks, right? Nothing happens.
But assume that you have good content, which I know is a stretch.
Assume you have good content.
It’s something people want.
It’s something that people were happy to receive.
How much content should you create? How many formats every time you publish a piece of content, it is this.
Right? So if you have a monthly newsletter, then once a month, you get a chance to throw some sparks.
Maybe it catches some people’s attention.
Well, if you have a weekly newsletter, once a week, for a month, four to five opportunities.
You’re throwing more sparks.
And then you have a daily blog post.
You have some posts on social media.
I have content on your YouTube channel.
Right and you have conferences and trade shows.
You have a podcast, maybe two podcasts, and you have little snippets that you take from that and put it on Instagram, and on tick tock.
You see what I’m getting with this content or sparks? Right and as long as it’s good.
Then every single time you publish every time you put something out there you give people a chance to interact with you if you’re creating an opportunity to possibly light something on fire.
We are in a unprecedented deficit of attention.
Think about just these four names Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Disney Plus, these four services occupied the eyes and ears of like 90% of our customers.
Think about these names, Spotify, Apple Music.
Again, Amazon Prime music all these services occupy the ears like 90% of our customers.
So much attention is being vacuumed up that if we just have a monthly newsletter and that’s it.
Even if it’s really great.
It’s not a lot of sparks.
We’re not throwing a lot of sparks out there and as a result, things aren’t catching on fire.
If you can increase the cadence of your content while maintaining Quality or improving quality, if that’s the caveat, if you can increase the canes while keeping the quality the same or better, then you’re putting more sparks out there giving people more to react to that,
Christopher Penn 5:14
in turn creates opportunities for more conversions.
sales folks know this.
The more times that a salesperson picks up the phone and dials or sends an email something, the more likely it is, they will eventually get some kind of response, even if the response is please stop calling me.
As opposed as being ignored.
We have to do the same thing with our content with our marketing.
If it’s good if it’s helpful, if it’s educational, if it’s entertaining, the more we publish, the more we give someone a chance to react to us.
Look at your open rates for your newsletter.
Look at your click through rates.
Look at your impressions and engagements on social media and the monitoring tool, your choice.
Go look in Google Search Console for impressions and clicks.
And you will see how little attention you get.
I was looking at Twitter the other day and like, my average tweet gets something like 2000 3000 impressions out of 95,000 followers, right? It’s terrible.
And it doesn’t, there doesn’t seem to be a difference.
When I look how often I publish my publishing on one tweet a day or five tweets, wait a day, on average, it works out to about 2000 impressions in a given time.
But they’re not the same 2000 people are different, because the way algorithms work and they select you know, based on topics and keywords and stuff.
So if I can create more content, more stuff, more opportunities for people to see and hear what I’m saying as long as it’s valuable, I get a greater chance of interacting with other people.
And I get a better chance of earning attention.
So give that some thought.
We’re at a point now, in the attention game, where any scrap of attention you’ve got is valuable.
You need to hold on to it and create more and more and more opportunities for people to give you their attention by handing them the value that they they’re looking for.
So give that some thought.
And thanks for watching.
I appreciate your attention.
You might also enjoy:
- Mind Readings: What Makes A Good Conference/Event?
- You Ask, I Answer: Retrieval Augmented Generation vs Fine-Tuning?
- You Ask, I Answer: Retrieval Augmented Generation for Tax Law?
- Almost Timely News, February 11, 2024: How To Evaluate a Generative AI System
- You Ask, I Answer: AI Works And Copyright?
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
 Take my Generative AI for Marketers course! |
Leave a Reply