Over the long weekend I had enough time to read the Walter Isaacson biography of Steve Jobs. Talk about a wonderful read, engrossing from start to finish. It was clear even just early on in the book that Steve was a very flawed individual with many personal demons that chased him throughout his life, and ultimately likely were partly responsible for his untimely death. At the same time, it was those flaws that drove him to do amazing things and ultimately create the most valuable company in the world.
One of the core questions that Isaacson leaves readers with is whether a less flawed Steve Jobs would have been able to accomplish as much as he did. I think the answer to that question lies in the equally mysterious Damascus steel.
If you’re unfamiliar with Damascus steel, it’s a type of steel made in India that eventually found its way to Syria in ancient times. Damascus steel was renowned for both its strength and beauty, with patterns in it that resemble ripples on a lake. While the method of making authentic Damascus steel was lost over four centuries ago, research has shown that what makes it an extraordinary steel wasn’t the iron itself or the forging techniques.
What makes Damascus steel so wonderful and the heart of sword making in the Middle East from the third to the seventeenth centuries was actually impurities in the metal. Vanadium and molybdenum were found in samples of antique Damascus blades that caused the steel to change into Damascus steel. Those impurities caused the signature patterns in the metal and lent it incredible strength and sharpness. Without those impurities, you’d have ordinary steel – strong and resilient, to be sure, but lacking all of the qualities that make Damascus steel what it is.
I’d argue that the same would have been true for Steve Jobs. His obsessive attention to detail, polar reactions to everything with no room for a middle ground, and the ability to simply choose not to believe or pay attention to things he wasn’t focused on made him incredibly difficult to work with. It made him a very poor family man. It made him many more enemies than friends, even if those enemies gave him grudging respect. But it made him Steve Jobs, and it made Apple the dominant technology company of its era, twice.
There are also two lessons I took from Isaacson’s biography. First, you can’t bottle Steve. His experiences, his trials, and his flaws were his alone, and while you could try to be more bold in your work or more detail oriented, you and I will never be Steve Jobs, no matter how hard we try. There will be a great many business managers and leaders who will read Isaacson’s book and conclude that they should be able to achieve 5% of Steve’s greatness by emulating 5% of his personal traits, and it just doesn’t work like that, in the same way that you will not get Damascus steel by obtaining only 5% of the needed impurities. It’s more or less an all-or-nothing deal in both cases.
Second, and I think more important, Steve’s story is ultimately a story of transformation. He was able through skill, hard work, luck, and sheer will to take his personal flaws and transform them into powerful allies that helped him to create what he did. Rather than want to be Steve, ask yourself this: what peculiar flaws and personality traits do you have of your own that you can transform from hindrances into exceptional capabilities?
Perhaps procrastination is in your personal makeup. What would happen if you consciously chose when you would and wouldn’t procrastinate? Certainly, the ability to put off unimportant things forever would vastly increase your productivity, if you could “turn it off” when you faced the important things.
Perhaps bold, “let’s just go do it” is in your personal makeup. What would your life look like if, when facing important decisions, you could forge ahead while your competitors dithered?
How could you turn those traits that you were once scorned and scolded for into the brightest lights of your work?
You might also enjoy:
- How To Set Your Consulting Billing Rates and Fees
- Transformer les personnes, les processus et la technologie - Christopher S. Penn - Conférencier principal sur la science des données marketing
- What Content Marketing Analytics Really Measures
- It's Okay to Not Be Okay Right Now
- How to Measure the Marketing Impact of Public Speaking
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers
I loved the book. I think what Steve had was also personal insight into himself, warts and all. He tried to temper some of his less attractive traits, and knew at his heart what was important to him, even if it wasn’t always what was important to everyone else, and he wasn’t always wise in listening to counsel of those who wanted to save him from heart ache, either.
What I took away from the story is that knowing your own self well, and acknowledging your talents and faults to others helps you be better understood, so people can take the good with the bad- doing the offset accounting so to speak, and learn to work around your less affective sides. It also teaches you to recognize where you aren’t the best person for the job, and when to put someone else talented in that spot instead.I think we all do well having a few folks who will tell us when we’re out of our tree. Folks who will give us advice we don’t want to hear, advice we may not follow, because it serves as a backdrop for the lessons life is about to dish out, as well. We all need close friends and colleagues who we trust and believe in, and listen to- like the guy who told Jobs they needed to redesign aspects of the Apple Store before launch- he didn’t want to hear it, it meant delay and more work, but he knew it was right, and what needed to be done. The folks who tell us what we need to hear, not what we want to hear, are the most precious friends of all.
CHRISTOPHER, I CAME AWAY WITH MANY OF THE SAME FEELINGS. HE IS CERTAINLY TO BE APPRECIATED……..AND COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE EMULATED. WARREN [DJ’S DAD]
Really a great post and Its been a worth full reading about Steve Jobs for someone who is laking in their ideas and can’t make it to succeed into their profession.