In the past week, I’ve been testing out Facebook’s pre-filled registration form plugin, which lets users who are logged into Facebook have their data conveniently pre-filled for them. After all, the less people have to type in, the better, right?
Here’s an example of the old signup form and popup:
Pretty bland, but straightforward.
Here’s an example of the Facebook-based one:
Much sexier. The copy is still the same, explaining the benefits, but you get the Facebook look and feel, as well as some social proof and much less to type in. Note that I’ve used the same code in both the site signup form and popup.
I predicted significantly more conversion from the Facebook-based form and popup for my newsletter. After all, it has social proof, it has convenience, it has a nicer look and feel. Let’s see side by side how the pop-up and regular form did on a week over week basis.
Well then. For my site, for my audience, for this period of time, Facebook’s pre-filled registration form and popup performed 21 times more poorly than a regular, boring, plain popup and form. This stunned me. Even though the past week had double the site visitors and more attention than most weeks on the blog, this result is fairly shocking.
The moral of the story? Always be testing. Just because it’s on the front page of Mashable or Techcrunch doesn’t mean it’ll do you a bit of good, no matter what your social media expert friends say.
As an aside, this is one of the reasons why you should encourage your employees to maintain personal sites, blogs, social media accounts, etc. If I had done this on Blue Sky Factory’s corporate website and reduced inbound lead generation by 2,100% in a week, I’d be looking for a new job. Instead, I just have fewer subscribers on my personal list, and with luck, they’ll come back when I write another useful blog post and I’ll catch them then, and the company incurs no substantial harm.
How has Facebook pre-filled registration form stuff been working for you? Similar results? Dissimilar results?
You might also enjoy:
- How To Start Your Public Speaking Career
- B2B Email Marketers: Stop Blocking Personal Emails
- Almost Timely News, 17 October 2021: Content Creation Hacks, Vanity Metrics, NFTs
- How to Measure the Marketing Impact of Public Speaking
- The Basic Truth of Mental Health
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers
I’ve been told I’m atypical, but I tend to not click to a lot of stuff when I’m on Facebook. It’s not just a matter of how what I’m clicking on (or filling out) will impact my own privacy settings, but because applications and the like also affect friends’ privacy settings, I do my best not to extend too far beyond the Facebook framework.
Also, could it be possible that a lot of the people who would see this on Facebook are already subscribers?
It’s possible, but one thing I didn’t include was % new visitors, which has been higher than normal.
Thanks for sharing these test results. Along with the privacy and existing subscriber factors that Marjorie cited, other factors could be the “Subscribe now for free!” button copy vs. “Register” which can have a whole different perception. And with that gray disclaimer text (“access to your Friends list”) and Facebook look-and-feel, some users may assume all the fields are required and it’s another Farmville-style app, since the form’s borders separate it from the newsletter overview copy.
It would be interesting to see the differences in clicks on the “click here to learn more” link above the form; that could shed more light on the variance. With those traffic numbers, it’s worth a follow-up test or two.
Maybe it is the way, how you explain and communicate such a change. I mean Facebook Connect or Facebook Log-Ins are a big success. Tell your readers why you did it and how they are benefiting from that change. I also agree with Hunter. The word “registration” is a big difference to “subscribe now for free”.
i want to get the plugin u used here is ther a plugin to use (i francly only use wordpress)