Molly asks, “Would you say that most agencies who want to support inclusive marketing or “sell it” don’t really have an inclusive/diverse organization?”
Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.
Listen to the audio here:
- Take my new Generative AI course!
- Got a question for You Ask, I’ll Answer? Submit it here!
- Subscribe to my weekly newsletter for more useful marketing tips.
- Subscribe to Inbox Insights, the Trust Insights newsletter for weekly fresh takes and data.
- Find older episodes of You Ask, I Answer on my YouTube channel.
- Need help with your company’s data and analytics? Let me know!
- Join my free Slack group for marketers interested in analytics!
Machine-Generated Transcript
What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.
Christopher Penn 0:12
In today’s episode, Molly asks, Would you say that most agencies who want to support inclusive marketing or sell it, don’t really have an inclusive or diverse organization? Oh, Molly.
This is one of my favorite bones to pick about a lot of agencies, particularly in marketing, PR and advertising.
They are very strongly monocultures.
It’s not just a lack of diversity is a monoculture of people.
monoculture of thinking, a monoculture of behavior and values.
When you look, go to the go
Christopher Penn 0:58
to the top three PR agencies or the top three marketing agencies in your city, go to the team page, go to the leadership page, and look around and just do some counting, particularly if you are an area where you know, the demographic distributions.
For example, years ago, I worked at an email marketing company.
And it was based in Atlanta.
And if you looked at the leadership page of this company, it was 80%, male and 100% White.
Now, if you know anything about Atlanta, Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, is an extremely diverse city, but the majority population is black.
Right? So if an organization was representative of the population that it was serving, it would also be majority black.
Right? And there wasn’t out of 75 people on staff there was not a single black
person at that agency.
And when I asked
Christopher Penn 1:57
them about this, how we couldn’t find any qualified candidates, I’m sorry, this is a city of what a million people, 2 million people, you can’t find one person here.
That doesn’t look like you that can’t do the job that you do, which by the way, is just attend meetings all day and drink coffee.
Pretty sure I can find a whole bunch of people who could do that.
No, Molly, you are 100%.
Right.
There is a very, very distinct a lack of diversity, particularly at the leadership levels in marketing, advertising and PR agencies.
And again, just do the leadership test, Go to the principal’s page, go to the the leadership page on any agency’s website
and tally up the numbers, right, who is there? Now,
Christopher Penn 2:50
should you be hiring people just because they are like Korean? For example? No, you should still be hiring qualified people.
But there are so many biases,
extrinsic and intrinsic biases that
Christopher Penn 3:11
we have not solved in hiring, we have not solved the hiring, even those solutions exist.
We have not solved because organizations by and large, don’t seem willing to
make a commitment to that
Christopher Penn 3:26
to those changes.
And yes, some things take time, right? If you’ve got an agency that’s been around for 70 years, right, you’re probably still waiting for the last generation or two generations to retire.
But your mid level management should be more diverse, right? Because as as time goes on, that mid level management gets higher and higher, and eventually should represent the place and the talent pool it draws from.
For an agency that was started, say in the last 20 years agency started in the 21st century, there is no excuse for a lack of diversity.
None.
We have known that diversity and inclusion is important.
McKinsey has written a number of studies saying that, that diverse and inclusive organizations are more profitable, right? So I believe in it was like a 2017 study that said that on average, organizations with diverse and inclusive leadership were 14% more profitable than organizations of monocultures which again is not a huge surprise, right? The more different viewpoints you have in the boardroom, the more solutions or potential solutions you have to be able to draw from right if you’ve got people who are black who are female, who are non binary, who are American Indian, who are East Asian Indian, if you’ve got people who are old people who are young people who have are gamers, people who are just I just gay.
All these different backgrounds, all these different lived life experiences, how come with winning strategies, right? Someone who grew up Asian in an Asian culture has some winning strategies they take from their culture, someone who grew up Catholic has some winning strategies they take from their culture.
Yeah, and you need as many of these as possible where you run into trouble is when you have a monoculture when everybody thinks the same, you then can’t come up with new ideas, you can’t come up with better ideas.
When we look at things like machine learning and AI, these things are being trained on massive datasets that represent the scope of human experience.
Right? So if you’re trying to, to match the outputs of what machines can do you to have to draw from the scope of human experience, not just from a segment of it, if you want to be competitive against what machines can do.
So yes, I would say that there are a number of organizations, not just agencies, either, all companies again, go to the leadership page of any company and look at the breakouts, what percentage of the the leadership of a company is one gender or another, right? If you represented the population, it should probably be about 4040 20 40%, identifying as male 40%, identifying as female, and about 20% that chooses not to identify, if you look at the statistics about Gen Z, in particular, the first generation that has felt the freedom to express themselves by non traditional gender constructs at work up to 20 to 25% of them don’t identify with a classical heteronormative role.
So just on that basis alone, you look at the leadership page, and you should see that level of representation if an agency that says it’s diverse and inclusive, is doing it now, if an agency does not make that claim, an agency says no, we don’t care about diversity, or, you know, they just don’t mention it, then, yeah, I would say you don’t have to call them on it, because they’re not.
They’re not saying that they’re not saying something that they aren’t.
Right.
If on the other hand, you have an agency that loudly proclaims, you know, they’re talking about diversity inclusion, and they support black lives matter.
That’s good.
We want them to do that, well, people to do that.
But then you look at the leadership page, and there’s zero black people, they’re like, Okay,
well,
Christopher Penn 7:31
you need to do some more work, you need to do some work to get to the point where the people that you claim to represent are, in fact, actually part and parcel of the business.
And then those not easier, right? It is not easy to change cultures, it is not easy to move people in the direction that the culture overall is moving.
There are a lot of folks who don’t see the value in it.
And there are some folks who believe that greater diversity inclusion means less opportunity for them, which, depending on their level of skill might be true, right? If you have if you open up a hiring pool to everybody.
And you know, 40% of the hiring pool is terrific.
And 20 to 60% is not and you’ve got somebody who’s in that 60% category.
Yeah.
There, there are fewer seats available for people who are who don’t meet the qualifications regard and they might have this is the difference, they might have had a chance previously when you excluded large groups of people, right? If you excluded
all women, for example, then yeah, by definition that
Christopher Penn 8:43
that person with mediocre to poor skills might have slipped in under the radar, because they were, you know, there were a few people candidates available to fill those seats.
Once you open the exam, say, hey, let’s try hiring from the other 50% of the population.
The overall talent pool rises, the number of competent people in the talent pool rises, and employers have their choice of an overall bigger part of highly qualified people.
And so all those people who are in the less qualified part, they are gonna get left out.
And so it then
creates an
Christopher Penn 9:26
onus of responsibility on those individuals to skill up, to skill up to get better at what they do whatever it is that you do.
So that you’re more competitive in the global workplace.
The biggest threat
Christopher Penn 9:41
and I’m gonna say this real carefully, but the biggest threat is not diversity or inclusion.
The biggest threat is machine learning and AI for a lot of roles, because right now machines can do mediocre work.
And if your skills are below mediocre, your career is in danger not from a woman or both.
Black person or Korean or gay person, it’s under threat from a machine that will do your job, or good chunks of your job for pennies on the dollar of what you cost as a human.
If companies are, continue to
Christopher Penn 10:16
be highly profit motivated, which in a capitalist economy, they will be the machines are going to be your first choice, not the diversity, hire the machine because the machine doesn’t get sick, the machine doesn’t catch COVID, the machine doesn’t show up drunk, the machine just does its job, right.
And that’s going to be the biggest challenge for people in any industry in the next 20 years.
So you got to get skilled up again, not to be saying that a diversity hire or something is is taking your position, but the machines will be the machines absolutely will be.
And this holds true for everybody, regardless of your background, regardless of your ethnicity, or your sexual orientation or whatever.
We are all in a race to become better, because our machines are becoming better.
So diversity and inclusion is something that is absolutely important.
It is the critical path to getting to better results because of diversity of thought.
It is one of your few insurance policies against the machines because again, a wider body of thought means better, more unorthodox solutions that machines have not seen before yet.
And if you say you’re gonna be if you say you’re diverse, be diverse if you if you if you talk the talk, you got to walk the walk.
That’s just the way that works.
Christopher Penn 11:49
Good question.
We could spend a whole lot of time on this a whole lot of time, but that’s a good place to leave it for now.
Thanks for asking.
If you’d like this video, go ahead and hit that subscribe button.
You might also enjoy:
- You Ask, I Answer: AI Works And Copyright?
- You Ask, I Answer: Retrieval Augmented Generation for Tax Law?
- Mind Readings: Generative AI and Addition vs Substitution of Jobs
- Almost Timely News, February 4, 2024: What AI Has Made Scarce
- You Ask, I Answer: Retrieval Augmented Generation vs Fine-Tuning?
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
 Take my Generative AI for Marketers course! |
Leave a Reply