I lost 2,000 subscribers to my newsletter two weeks ago. And I’m okay with that. They would have been terrible customers. Here’s why.
Can’t see anything? Watch it on YouTube here.
Listen to the audio here:
- Got a question for You Ask, I’ll Answer? Submit it here!
- Subscribe to my weekly newsletter for more useful marketing tips.
- Find older episodes of You Ask, I Answer on my YouTube channel.
- Need help with your company’s data and analytics? Let me know!
- Join my free Slack group for marketers interested in analytics!
What follows is an AI-generated transcript. The transcript may contain errors and is not a substitute for watching the video.
Christopher Penn 0:15
In today’s mind reading, I lost 2000 subscribers to my newsletter two weeks ago.
And I’m actually okay with that.
So here’s what happened.
For those who have been around for a while, I publish a newsletter if you’re not familiar every Sunday called almost timely news.
And two weeks ago, as of the date of this recording, which was the end of February, the war, the invasion of Ukraine began.
And I dedicated the entire issue of the newsletter to letting people know how they could help.
And I got a bunch of positive feedback.
And I got a bunch of negative feedback to everything from people saying was fake news to people saying all sorts of crazy, crazy stuff that has no basis in reality.
To people saying, you know, I’m a sock puppet for certain politicians, all sorts of stuff.
And the net result was probably 10x, the normal amount of people unsubscribed from my newsletter on a weekly basis.
And I’m okay with that.
The reason I’m okay with as not because of the politics, not because of the issue is not because of the negative feedback.
It is because the people who had a negative reaction to what is a fairly cut and dried, as close to black and white as you can get in the real world example.
Those people will be terrible customers, those people will be terrible customers, for me, and my company and my business because my company Trust Insights is built around data analysis, data science, management, consulting.
And fundamentally, our business is predicated on getting as close to the truth as possible with data and analytics.
Which means that somebody who is so resistant to the data that is in front of them, that is fairly close to objective reality.
There, they their vehement denial of reality means that they wouldn’t be a great customer.
Right? Because you know, that that same mindset, that same denial of reality would apply to anything we put in front of them would say, Hey, here’s your attribution model.
And it shows that, you know, your, your favorite social network actually has a minus 60% ROI.
And we could expect the same reaction.
Well, no, no, that’s, that’s that’s fake.
Google Analytics is set up wrong, or it’s got bot traffic interfering or pick your excuse, right, pick your excuse for refusing to believe in the data that is literally in front of you.
And these are also folks who are for their point of view is informed by data points.
And they will tell you that they’ve gotten proof of their point of view, and I’m sure they do, but it’s wrong.
It’s objectively incorrect.
That also means that they don’t have the ability to think critically about their sources of data, and to understand what is and is not credible data.
And that’s true, any conspiracy theorist on any part of the political spectrum, liberal conservative, right wing, left wing, pick a wing, if all the data that you rely on is coming from suspect sources that are not been peer reviewed, that have not been vetted, that have not been validated in some way.
Then when you do work with a company like ours, where we say, Yeah, you gotta check your sources, you got to make sure that your your code is operating, your tracking pixels are working, that your UTM governance is good.
They’re going to be resistant to that to say it’s not important or it’s not real, or the system’s not working right, or, you know, take your pick.
And so, one of the things that I think could be worth contemplating for our businesses yours in mind, is how do our values and Our points of view about the world and the different issues in the world, how do those values translate into business? How do they translate into identifying whether somebody is going to be a good customer or not? Right?
Christopher Penn 5:12
Let’s say somebody is racist and doesn’t like Koreans, right? It’s gonna be really hard working with them.
When, you know, on every video call, here’s me saying, Hey, what’s going on, and they’ll be like, Oh, I really want to work with this person.
That’s a case where the values will be so far out of sync, that it will be hard to get any real work done, or hard to get any meaningful work done.
And it’s been an interesting shift mentally, in the last sort of 20 years in business, from going from a perspective, where business should be absolutely neutral and devoid of politics or religion, or perspective.
And all these things.
Just be strictly about the making of the money to where we are today, where things like values are actually starting to take hold in business, in meaningful ways, and in ways where companies are willing to say no to people whose values they don’t align with.
And I think that’s a good thing.
It does increase, you know, sort of the the environment of polarization and make civil debate more challenging.
But at the same time, if a customer is fundamentally opposed to who you are, and what you do, and the things that you stand for, and the things that make your staff happy, they’re not going to be a great customer.
Right, no matter how much money they bring to the table and stuff like that, they’re not going to be a great customer.
And we are seeing more companies, particularly startups that are more values driven, where they say, yeah, there’s some customers we’re not going to take, we’re going to say no to them, we’re gonna say no to their money.
And that’s, of course, everybody’s right.
There are some things.
Yeah, we were not okay with that.
And because it’s a private, these for the most part private industry.
To say that, yeah, I’m not comfortable working with a company, who is unwilling to believe that two plus two literally equals four, who is unwilling to believe that this regression model says what it says because it does, I can’t change the numbers, I can’t change the truth.
The objective reality of what the data says, I can change my interpretation of it.
But reality is reality.
So that’s today’s mind reading, give some thought to, what would it look like? If your values impacted who you decided to take on as customers? Would you take on a customer who was opposed to your values? Would you take on a customer who not just a little bit substantially did not believe in the same things as your company and the things that your company was trying to accomplish in the world part of your mission, your vision, your value statements? Would you take on customers that were opposed to that and if so, why? If not, why not? Give it some thought.
I have and I’m okay with saying goodbye to people who don’t believe in the value of data and and in basic, objective truths.
Thanks for watching.
We’ll talk to you soon
You might also enjoy:
- Transformer les personnes, les processus et la technologie - Christopher S. Penn - Conférencier principal sur la science des données marketing
- What Is The Difference Between Analysis and Insight?
- Almost Timely News, 17 October 2021: Content Creation Hacks, Vanity Metrics, NFTs
- Retiring Old Email Marketing Strategies
- B2B Email Marketers: Stop Blocking Personal Emails
Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:
Get your copy of AI For Marketers