Marketing Sucks

Warning: this content is older than 365 days. It may be out of date and no longer relevant.

Marketing Sucks

Marketing sucks. That’s the perception that many, many consumers have about marketing, for good or ill. Here’s an example of what I mean. Richard Mondello, a high school senior in Dover Plains, New York, recently wrote on his blog:

In my opinion, marketers will always be marketers. It’s their job to manipulate you into purchasing their product or service, and this isn’t arguable.

This is depressing, mostly because Richard’s right. Decades of bad behavior, bad marketing, bad advertising, and general shortsightedness on the part of corporate marketing departments have blackened the profession’s name to the very people we want to reach.

At every opportunity for new means of communicating, bad actors work as fast as possible to piss in the pool in the hopes that they’ll be able to scrape up a few meager commissions or sales before being consigned to the bin of perpetual ignorage by consumers in that channel.

Don’t believe me? Here’s one of my favorite examples – Twitter is 18 months old and has tons of clueless marketers trying to garner attention every hour of every day. Not a single day goes by when I don’t get a follower notification from some asshat marketer whose Twitterstream is only pimpage.

How did it all go wrong? Short term thinking, short term vision. When companies, organizations, or individuals focus only on the short term, whether it’s quarterly results on the Street or whether you can get some action at the single’s bar tonight, the same desperation is created by short term thinking. That combined with a profit above all else mentality has turned marketing into the corporate equivalent of that guy in the bar who smells of equal parts aggression, fear, and desperation – and the target audience stays far, far away.

Marketing can be more than this. Marketing can be more than desperate selling or attention whoring. Marketing can be, at its ideal, the sharing of ideas, the promotion of ideas. One of my favorite quotes from Seth Godin is that marketing can kill people. Bad marketing has basically been responsible for things like genocide in Darfur or the war in Iraq because the ideas that would have led to the most favorable outcome were not marketed as well as the ideas that have led to current outcomes.

So how do we get from desperate, lonely attention whoring (buy my product! digg my article! watch my video! pay attention to me!) to the ideal McMarketing outcome – billions and billions of lives saved? It really comes down to a change in our perception of what marketing is. Look at what the American Marketing Association says marketing is:

Marketing is an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders.

Quick, close your eyes and try to remember that. I’d say marketing has a branding issue, wouldn’t you?

Try this:

Marketing is the sharing of ideas.

The idea that college is affordable with the right solutions.
The idea that a conference can be more than wooden panels and hotel food.
The idea that a marketing podcast can inform and entertain.
The idea that you can change your life for the better in an instant.

We need to change our own belief system about marketing from corporate pimpage to the sharing of ideas, of knowledge, of insight. If you have a product or service that is unremarkable, that is not worth sharing, either change your product or create something on top of the product that is worth sharing. That’s been the basic idea behind the Financial Aid Podcast. Student loans – especially federal student loans – are commodity products. They’re fundamentally more or less the exact same thing, give or take a few minor details. So how do you make a commodity interesting? I couldn’t.

But what I could do was create something else that was interesting – an internet radio show and new media initiative that changed how I thought about financial aid, and in turn helped others to change their ideas about financial aid. Instead of being a boring, obscure process that happened behind closed doors and in back room deals at conferences and golf courses, the Financial Aid Podcast has helped to bring at least part of the financial aid process out into the open, into the digital dialogue. It’s about sharing the ideas I’ve learned in financial aid with everyone and anyone who wants to listen and have a conversation about financial aid.

Are my ideas any good? That’s for the audience to judge, but based on the results so far – thousands of listeners, thousands of friends on Twitter, LinkedIn, and other networks, coverage in US News & World Report, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, WCVB Boston 5 – I’d say that they’re at least worth talking about to some degree.

If you’re a marketer, the very best thing you can do is to start figuring out what ideas you have that are worth sharing. Not products, not services, not pimpage, but actual ideas. If you work at a company that, frankly, has no ideas worth sharing, you either have to create them, or work for a different company.

What are your ideas worth sharing?

Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, please subscribe right now!

Marketing Sucks 1 Marketing Sucks 2 Marketing Sucks 3

Get this and other great articles from the source at www.ChristopherSPenn.com


Comments

21 responses to “Marketing Sucks”

  1. I obviously agree that marketing has a branding problem. But then again, I’m not the average consumer. I’m one of those people who refuses to watch TV because of the ads. Yeah, one of those people.

    Watching people market themselves on twitter is just testing how much humility one can handle. There are people like Jason Calacanis who boisterously pimp their services left and right, but there are others like Chris Brogan and Laura Fitton who market themselves and their services by being human.

    It’ll be hard to rebrand marketing due to the jaded people out there, like me. But, I think you’re well on your way.

  2. AMEN!
    Short term thinking is one of the biggest problems with not only marketing, but how we measure results. Short-term thinking creates short term results. Listen to the last Managing the Grey. Why was the Ford sponsorship of Manic Mommy’s so successful? Because it built relationships. Instead of using an air horn for immediate results, it was a pat on the back and a friendly conversation that built influence for the long-term.

    I’m also thinking of ways to expand on a sharing of ideas and insight in my own marketing initiatives. What do I have to offer? What do we as a group of people engaged in what amounts to a commodity product that will bring more people into the fold?

    It’s always a challenge, and something I know I am and will continually be refining. Thanks for your additional thoughts Chris. You nailed it on the head!

  3. I obviously agree that marketing has a branding problem. But then again, I’m not the average consumer. I’m one of those people who refuses to watch TV because of the ads. Yeah, one of those people.

    Watching people market themselves on twitter is just testing how much humility one can handle. There are people like Jason Calacanis who boisterously pimp their services left and right, but there are others like Chris Brogan and Laura Fitton who market themselves and their services by being human.

    It’ll be hard to rebrand marketing due to the jaded people out there, like me. But, I think you’re well on your way.

  4. AMEN!
    Short term thinking is one of the biggest problems with not only marketing, but how we measure results. Short-term thinking creates short term results. Listen to the last Managing the Grey. Why was the Ford sponsorship of Manic Mommy’s so successful? Because it built relationships. Instead of using an air horn for immediate results, it was a pat on the back and a friendly conversation that built influence for the long-term.

    I’m also thinking of ways to expand on a sharing of ideas and insight in my own marketing initiatives. What do I have to offer? What do we as a group of people engaged in what amounts to a commodity product that will bring more people into the fold?

    It’s always a challenge, and something I know I am and will continually be refining. Thanks for your additional thoughts Chris. You nailed it on the head!

  5. I’m a former marketer. I am now in sales. Love ’em, or hate ’em, every company needs a marketer to generate revenue. Marketing drives sales. Period.

  6. I’m a former marketer. I am now in sales. Love ’em, or hate ’em, every company needs a marketer to generate revenue. Marketing drives sales. Period.

  7. “the corporate equivalent of that guy in the bar who smells of equal parts aggression, fear, and desperation”…BINGO!

    That’s what I think of when I surf marketing, business, and trend websites that are trying to “monetize” social networking sites. They see a big pool of potential customers and they are intensely frustrated that they don’t have a piece of the action. They are furiously waving red flags at their colleagues shouting, “Look at all of these people over here!”

    Then I chime in with my idealistic, “If you commercialize social networking (more than it already is), you’ll kill it completely. People won’t Twitter or MySpace or FaceBook or MeetUp or whatever if they are going to have to fend off marketing pitches or, worse, attempts at viral marketing that are patently obvious. The appeal of these places is that people can connect with others who they share some commonality with (sports, music, industry, high school, etc.).

    Corporations will never create genuine social networks on their own sites that can replicate this. The only exception I can think of is user support sites like Microsoft or other technology discussion boards but the reason most people visit those sites is because their software ISN’T working, not to compliment Microsoft on their fine, fine products. Second Life is commercialized but users can control how deeply they want to get into that virtual world.

    It seems like marketers also want to control the message. You put up a Coke Fans bulletin board and there will be as many “Coke sucks” messages as people who like their product. But if you put in a moderating system, it drives people away in droves.

    Basically, the day marketers control or influence online social networking (any more than they do), is the day it dies. People will just move on to something else.

    End of rant. I just get a little sick reading marketing blogs that treat the “masses” as merely potential revenue sources. And most people are smart enough now to smell their contempt and stay away from contrived marketing campaigns. I’ll step off my soapbox now.

  8. “the corporate equivalent of that guy in the bar who smells of equal parts aggression, fear, and desperation”…BINGO!

    That’s what I think of when I surf marketing, business, and trend websites that are trying to “monetize” social networking sites. They see a big pool of potential customers and they are intensely frustrated that they don’t have a piece of the action. They are furiously waving red flags at their colleagues shouting, “Look at all of these people over here!”

    Then I chime in with my idealistic, “If you commercialize social networking (more than it already is), you’ll kill it completely. People won’t Twitter or MySpace or FaceBook or MeetUp or whatever if they are going to have to fend off marketing pitches or, worse, attempts at viral marketing that are patently obvious. The appeal of these places is that people can connect with others who they share some commonality with (sports, music, industry, high school, etc.).

    Corporations will never create genuine social networks on their own sites that can replicate this. The only exception I can think of is user support sites like Microsoft or other technology discussion boards but the reason most people visit those sites is because their software ISN’T working, not to compliment Microsoft on their fine, fine products. Second Life is commercialized but users can control how deeply they want to get into that virtual world.

    It seems like marketers also want to control the message. You put up a Coke Fans bulletin board and there will be as many “Coke sucks” messages as people who like their product. But if you put in a moderating system, it drives people away in droves.

    Basically, the day marketers control or influence online social networking (any more than they do), is the day it dies. People will just move on to something else.

    End of rant. I just get a little sick reading marketing blogs that treat the “masses” as merely potential revenue sources. And most people are smart enough now to smell their contempt and stay away from contrived marketing campaigns. I’ll step off my soapbox now.

  9. how about putting your money where your mouth is and give us something more than your sales pitch for ‘better marketing practices’ here? I like the premise of the article and because of social networking I arrived here but it’s still you trying to sell me on something without giving much for “free”.

    What will make me come back? after all it’s the relationship that matters these days right?

  10. how about putting your money where your mouth is and give us something more than your sales pitch for ‘better marketing practices’ here? I like the premise of the article and because of social networking I arrived here but it’s still you trying to sell me on something without giving much for “free”.

    What will make me come back? after all it’s the relationship that matters these days right?

  11. […] are some interesting related thoughts from Christopher Penn) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Blogger Socialites: Jaffe, Karpeles, Kerley, […]

  12. Rob Metras Avatar
    Rob Metras

    Would that all marketers be as creative and educational as you are Chris. You have taken a major problem,provided information, directed them to your products and done so in a way that solves peoples problems directly. It is no surprise that Twitter and Facebook users rail at the garbage that some marketers throw at them. Gen Y wants solutions that work, not b.s. maketing ploys.
    Bravo. Keep up the good work

  13. Would that all marketers be as creative and educational as you are Chris. You have taken a major problem,provided information, directed them to your products and done so in a way that solves peoples problems directly. It is no surprise that Twitter and Facebook users rail at the garbage that some marketers throw at them. Gen Y wants solutions that work, not b.s. maketing ploys.
    Bravo. Keep up the good work

  14. David Beaudouin Avatar
    David Beaudouin

    WOW! Sorry I missed this post when you first published it–clued in to it by Brogan. Terrific essay on why radical redesign on the concept of marketing is needed pronto. If you don’t mind, I’m passing this around (with full credits) to like-minded pals–thanks!

  15. David Beaudouin Avatar
    David Beaudouin

    WOW! Sorry I missed this post when you first published it–clued in to it by Brogan. Terrific essay on why radical redesign on the concept of marketing is needed pronto. If you don’t mind, I’m passing this around (with full credits) to like-minded pals–thanks!

  16. @Darren: good question. What would make you come back would logically at least be similar to what made you come here in the first place. Honestly, my personal blog probably isn’t the place I’d first send you. I’d send you to something like the Friday episodes of the Financial Aid Podcast, which ALWAYS have free stuff, useful stuff, and silly stuff that’s worth at least reading.

  17. @Darren: good question. What would make you come back would logically at least be similar to what made you come here in the first place. Honestly, my personal blog probably isn’t the place I’d first send you. I’d send you to something like the Friday episodes of the Financial Aid Podcast, which ALWAYS have free stuff, useful stuff, and silly stuff that’s worth at least reading.

  18. “At every opportunity for new means of communicating, bad actors work as fast as possible to piss in the pool in the hopes that they’ll be able to scrape up a few meager commissions or sales before being consigned to the bin of perpetual ignorage by consumers in that channel. “
    I feel that marketers that make a bad name for good marketers will eventually be force out of marketing with their bad behavior. I think you make some excellent points. I am quicker to pull out the purse for a marketer that I feel really help me.

  19. Marketing as a paradigm causes us to 'commoditize' everything, replacing intrinsic value with one artificially induced by 'spin'. Perhaps the most revolting form of this is 'self-marketing'; as if personal identity was transferable to someone else.

    Marketing a screwdriver is one thing, marketing a 'lifestyle' simply leads to shallow unhappiness on the part of the buyer. Which is of course the aim, as all marketing is directed toward its own self-perpetuation. What good (to a marketer) is a product/way of life that doesn't require further marketing? The 'self-help industry' is an excellent example of this.

    Fundamentally wrong.

  20. Marketing as a paradigm causes us to 'commoditize' everything, replacing intrinsic value with one artificially induced by 'spin'. Perhaps the most revolting form of this is 'self-marketing'; as if personal identity was transferable to someone else.

    Marketing a screwdriver is one thing, marketing a 'lifestyle' simply leads to shallow unhappiness on the part of the buyer. Which is of course the aim, as all marketing is directed toward its own self-perpetuation. What good (to a marketer) is a product/way of life that doesn't require further marketing? The 'self-help industry' is an excellent example of this.

    Fundamentally wrong.

  21. Marketing as a paradigm causes us to 'commoditize' everything, replacing intrinsic value with one artificially induced by 'spin'. Perhaps the most revolting form of this is 'self-marketing'; as if personal identity was transferable to someone else.

    Marketing a screwdriver is one thing, marketing a 'lifestyle' simply leads to shallow unhappiness on the part of the buyer. Which is of course the aim, as all marketing is directed toward its own self-perpetuation. What good (to a marketer) is a product/way of life that doesn't require further marketing? The 'self-help industry' is an excellent example of this.

    Fundamentally wrong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This