What’s the Difference Between Social Media and New Media?

Warning: this content is older than 365 days. It may be out of date and no longer relevant.

What's the Difference Between Social Media and New Media?

To describe media, marketers and communicators have used multiple, mixed-up terms. Here are just a few ways we’ve described the media landscape in recent years:

  • Old media
  • Mass media
  • Traditional media
  • New media
  • Digital media
  • Social media
  • Social networking
  • Citizen journalism

Of these, the differences between old media, new media, and social media are probably the most common – and the most confusion stems from the difference between new media and social media.

Why do we need to explain the difference? Why does anyone need to differentiate between new media and social media, or mass media and digital media? For many of our stakeholders – bosses, boards of directors, shareholders – the ability to articulate the different types of media also means we articulate the value of our efforts to reach our audience in different formats, as well as describe where we need to allocate resources.

Let’s dig into whatthese media terms mean, and how they’re different.

The Media Landscape

The new Media landscape diagram

What’s the difference between old media and new media?

What constitutes old, traditional, or mass media? Formats such as:

  • Print journalism
  • Radio
  • Television
  • Books
  • Out of home media

Old media is characterized mostly by cost of distribution; because it tends to be physical rather than digital, old media’s costs of production and distribution are high. Note that this isn’t specific to brands or organization sizes – the New York Times is old media, but so is the Boston University Daily Free Press or NPR. New media is characterized by its digital-first nature and its low physical costs of production and distribution. New media formats include:

  • Mobile apps
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • eBooks
  • Email
  • Podcasts
  • Smart device apps
  • Video games
  • Interactive content

New media relies on digital methods of distribution such as the Internet for reach; as such, new media is far more accessible for the average individual or small organization to produce. Certainly, individuals could have and did produce homemade newsletters, but their distribution was severely limited. In the new media landscape, an individual can have as much reach, engagement, and distribution as a Fortune 10 company.

What’s the difference between new media and social media?

Social media relies on one key principle that new media doesn’t necessarily rely on: the network effect. A new media property like a blog has inherent value, whether that blog has one reader or a million readers. On the other hand, a social network like Twitter would be valueless with one user. Only as the number of users – and contributors – rise do social networks become more valuable. Robert Metcalfe, the inventor of Ethernet, coined this term the network effect, in which the value of the network as a whole increases with every new node on that network.

This is the key difference between new media and social media: social media requires the network effect, while new media does not, in order to create value.

Social media from 2003-2013 was a subset of new media, a digital-first way to reach people. As times have changed, social media became more a form of broadcast, and then paid broadcast. Today, with algorithms and advertising dominating the ways to reach consumers on social media, it’s a different animal entirely. Today’s Facebook looks very much like a digital ads platform first.

Social media today still offers the occasional chance for something small to grow big and fast without investment, but as advertising has become dominant, social media now requires just as much, if not more, investment as traditional old media in order to reach the same scale and impact. We might not invest millions of dollars in building a TV station or a printing press, but we’ll spend millions of dollars with a company like Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn.

This distinction matters because it defines our strategy. We still need content, something to share when we go to buy our social media advertisements. Thus, we must lock down our new media strategy first, then develop our paid social media strategy second.

Disclosure: This post has been revised and updated several times since its original publication. The most recent revision added in Metcalfe’s network effects.


You might also enjoy:


Want to read more like this from Christopher Penn? Get updates here:

subscribe to my newsletter here


AI for Marketers Book
Take my Generative AI for Marketers course!

Analytics for Marketers Discussion Group
Join my Analytics for Marketers Slack Group!



Comments

65 responses to “What’s the Difference Between Social Media and New Media?”

  1. Good points.

    But I call the whole box on the right 'Social Multimedia'

    as seen at http://podcamp.phreadz.com 😉

  2. Great article, going to digg it. I agree I don't think that social media and new media are the same thing and I think that articles like yours will help people navigate this new environment and make better informed choices about how to use it.

  3. Like the breakdown. Where do you put email marketing in the mix? Or is that not “media” at all?

  4. It's not, no more so than the postal service is a form of media. Direct mail is a form of communication, but not media to me – after all, whether postal or digital, there's an awful lot of mail I get that I do *not* want others reading!

  5. I agree, Chris, but there is an important distinction to make, in my opinion.

    I see “new media” as the whole, encompassing all forms of content delivery via the Web. I actually see social media as more a subset of new media, a form of content delivery not unlike audio or video. It's true that social media is inherently two-way, but then again video and audio have that capacity as well. So does that make video and audio social media, or new media (In the case of your blog, perhaps, yes, because I can leave a video comment!)?

    In the end, it's a real grey area, I think. We are all in this space, inventing it as we go along. I guess it's up to us to some how define it too.

    Posts like yours are great because they get people thinking. I'm going off to ponder now. Thanks!

  6. I don't think that you can classify a conference as social media. It's a conference. Everything that people do there fits into one of the three categories, so if you're really looking to include PodCamp for some reason, it would stretch across all three or at least straddle the line between new and social media. I would also list is as “PodCamp content” and not PodCamp.

  7. @Susan: audio and video have that capacity to a degree, but enabled by other mechanisms, like comments. It gets grey and fuzzy to be sure!

  8. I'm not sure I can think of any new media that works without a social component of some sort. Blogs are not blogs without comments. Video sharing includes comments and/or easy linking/embedding features. Podcasts that don't involve audience feedback are just broadcasts. Thus I think of “new media” and “social media” interchangeably. The fundamental element to this new way of communicating is the two-way conversation. As long as that's in place in some form, I don't know if it matters so much what we call the medium.

  9. Where would you put the newspaper site that is online and has comments enabled? I think that over time that line in the middle is going to go away, and eventually the “new media” will just be media.

  10. Bingo, Dan. That's exactly it – after a while, it will all be media, period.

  11. awesome stuff but I think Blogs, Podcasts and YouTube can very much be part of “social media” it all depends on how it is used and what the content calls for. When used by “us” it's social, by “old media” it's them using new media and not social.

  12. Good points.

    But I call the whole box on the right 'Social Multimedia'

    as seen at http://podcamp.phreadz.com 😉

  13. Great article, going to digg it. I agree I don't think that social media and new media are the same thing and I think that articles like yours will help people navigate this new environment and make better informed choices about how to use it.

  14. Like the breakdown. Where do you put email marketing in the mix? Or is that not “media” at all?

  15. It's not, no more so than the postal service is a form of media. Direct mail is a form of communication, but not media to me – after all, whether postal or digital, there's an awful lot of mail I get that I do *not* want others reading!

  16. I agree, Chris, but there is an important distinction to make, in my opinion.

    I see “new media” as the whole, encompassing all forms of content delivery via the Web. I actually see social media as more a subset of new media, a form of content delivery not unlike audio or video. It's true that social media is inherently two-way, but then again video and audio have that capacity as well. So does that make video and audio social media, or new media (In the case of your blog, perhaps, yes, because I can leave a video comment!)?

    In the end, it's a real grey area, I think. We are all in this space, inventing it as we go along. I guess it's up to us to some how define it too.

    Posts like yours are great because they get people thinking. I'm going off to ponder now. Thanks!

  17. I don't think that you can classify a conference as social media. It's a conference. Everything that people do there fits into one of the three categories, so if you're really looking to include PodCamp for some reason, it would stretch across all three or at least straddle the line between new and social media. I would also list is as “PodCamp content” and not PodCamp.

  18. @Susan: audio and video have that capacity to a degree, but enabled by other mechanisms, like comments. It gets grey and fuzzy to be sure!

  19. I'm not sure I can think of any new media that works without a social component of some sort. Blogs are not blogs without comments. Video sharing includes comments and/or easy linking/embedding features. Podcasts that don't involve audience feedback are just broadcasts. Thus I think of “new media” and “social media” interchangeably. The fundamental element to this new way of communicating is the two-way conversation. As long as that's in place in some form, I don't know if it matters so much what we call the medium.

  20. I think the social aspect of the box on the right is still morphing. All of these things can have various degrees of interaction depending on the user / audience. For example, YouTube can be quite social with the multimedia calls and responses and conversations, and Twitter, for some, is still a one-way street. Nice shout-out to the Wasilla Frontiersman, btw – I've gotta check out their web presence (btw, what was Cheney's hometown newspaper?)

  21. Where would you put the newspaper site that is online and has comments enabled? I think that over time that line in the middle is going to go away, and eventually the “new media” will just be media.

  22. Bingo, Dan. That's exactly it – after a while, it will all be media, period.

  23. awesome stuff but I think Blogs, Podcasts and YouTube can very much be part of “social media” it all depends on how it is used and what the content calls for. When used by “us” it's social, by “old media” it's them using new media and not social.

  24. Craig Moore Avatar
    Craig Moore

    Media definition repsonse and question

  25. I think the social aspect of the box on the right is still morphing. All of these things can have various degrees of interaction depending on the user / audience. For example, YouTube can be quite social with the multimedia calls and responses and conversations, and Twitter, for some, is still a one-way street. Nice shout-out to the Wasilla Frontiersman, btw – I've gotta check out their web presence (btw, what was Cheney's hometown newspaper?)

  26. Good points.

    But I call the whole box on the right ‘Social Multimedia’

    as seen at http://podcamp.phreadz.com 😉

  27. Great article, going to digg it. I agree I don’t think that social media and new media are the same thing and I think that articles like yours will help people navigate this new environment and make better informed choices about how to use it.

  28. Like the breakdown. Where do you put email marketing in the mix? Or is that not “media” at all?

  29. It’s not, no more so than the postal service is a form of media. Direct mail is a form of communication, but not media to me – after all, whether postal or digital, there’s an awful lot of mail I get that I do *not* want others reading!

  30. KeithChilds Avatar
    KeithChilds

    I've tried various ways to map out new/social media and for me the key is the level of personal engagement- for example a company on Facebook is not really social as I define it- only individuals from the company can be social, with opinions and ideas. Throwing a video on to YouTube and seeing comments build up has a social element- but if the only thing you have done is to stimulate a conversation- and you ignore the comments then I think that's pseudo-social. If you have a blog with comments enabled, but nobody comments- maybe because you haven't said anything interesting- is it social?

  31. I agree, Chris, but there is an important distinction to make, in my opinion.

    I see “new media” as the whole, encompassing all forms of content delivery via the Web. I actually see social media as more a subset of new media, a form of content delivery not unlike audio or video. It's true that social media is inherently two-way, but then again video and audio have that capacity as well. So does that make video and audio social media, or new media (In the case of your blog, perhaps, yes, because I can leave a video comment!)?

    In the end, it's a real grey area, I think. We are all in this space, inventing it as we go along. I guess it's up to us to some how define it too.

    Posts like yours are great because they get people thinking. I'm going off to ponder now. Thanks!

  32. I don't think that you can classify a conference as social media. It's a conference. Everything that people do there fits into one of the three categories, so if you're really looking to include PodCamp for some reason, it would stretch across all three or at least straddle the line between new and social media. I would also list is as “PodCamp content” and not PodCamp.

  33. @Susan: audio and video have that capacity to a degree, but enabled by other mechanisms, like comments. It gets grey and fuzzy to be sure!

  34. Chris – love the distinction between requiring interaction and those forms that can be (but don't have to be) passive. Really helps to think about how the different forms of new media would be useful in very different ways depending on the level of interactivity, too…

  35. I'm not sure I can think of any new media that works without a social component of some sort. Blogs are not blogs without comments. Video sharing includes comments and/or easy linking/embedding features. Podcasts that don't involve audience feedback are just broadcasts. Thus I think of “new media” and “social media” interchangeably. The fundamental element to this new way of communicating is the two-way conversation. As long as that's in place in some form, I don't know if it matters so much what we call the medium.

  36. Where would you put the newspaper site that is online and has comments enabled? I think that over time that line in the middle is going to go away, and eventually the “new media” will just be media.

  37. Bingo, Dan. That's exactly it – after a while, it will all be media, period.

  38. awesome stuff but I think Blogs, Podcasts and YouTube can very much be part of “social media” it all depends on how it is used and what the content calls for. When used by “us” it's social, by “old media” it's them using new media and not social.

  39. KeithChilds Avatar
    KeithChilds

    I've tried various ways to map out new/social media and for me the key is the level of personal engagement- for example a company on Facebook is not really social as I define it- only individuals from the company can be social, with opinions and ideas. Throwing a video on to YouTube and seeing comments build up has a social element- but if the only thing you have done is to stimulate a conversation- and you ignore the comments then I think that's pseudo-social. If you have a blog with comments enabled, but nobody comments- maybe because you haven't said anything interesting- is it social?

  40. Chris – love the distinction between requiring interaction and those forms that can be (but don't have to be) passive. Really helps to think about how the different forms of new media would be useful in very different ways depending on the level of interactivity, too…

  41. I think the social aspect of the box on the right is still morphing. All of these things can have various degrees of interaction depending on the user / audience. For example, YouTube can be quite social with the multimedia calls and responses and conversations, and Twitter, for some, is still a one-way street. Nice shout-out to the Wasilla Frontiersman, btw – I've gotta check out their web presence (btw, what was Cheney's hometown newspaper?)

  42. KeithChilds Avatar
    KeithChilds

    I've tried various ways to map out new/social media and for me the key is the level of personal engagement- for example a company on Facebook is not really social as I define it- only individuals from the company can be social, with opinions and ideas. Throwing a video on to YouTube and seeing comments build up has a social element- but if the only thing you have done is to stimulate a conversation- and you ignore the comments then I think that's pseudo-social. If you have a blog with comments enabled, but nobody comments- maybe because you haven't said anything interesting- is it social?

  43. Chris – love the distinction between requiring interaction and those forms that can be (but don't have to be) passive. Really helps to think about how the different forms of new media would be useful in very different ways depending on the level of interactivity, too…

  44. As Guy Kawasaki tweeted to me in response to a question about differentiating Web 2.0 from Enterprise 2.0, “Either you have something good or you don't…The rest is just spin.”

    http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/statuses/860211620

    Similarly, I'll offer that on behalf of the general populace who need boxes and diagrams to be explained differences of then and now, I'd use one term, not two. While *I know* what you mean, Chris, comparing new media to social media, Joe Public doesn't without a diagram, so why make the diagram? Just use one term.

    And we're not even discussing digital media.

  45. As Guy Kawasaki tweeted to me in response to a question about differentiating Web 2.0 from Enterprise 2.0, “Either you have something good or you don't…The rest is just spin.”

    http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/statuses/860211620

    Similarly, I'll offer that on behalf of the general populace who need boxes and diagrams to be explained differences of then and now, I'd use one term, not two. While *I know* what you mean, Chris, comparing new media to social media, Joe Public doesn't without a diagram, so why make the diagram? Just use one term.

    And we're not even discussing digital media.

  46. As Guy Kawasaki tweeted to me in response to a question about differentiating Web 2.0 from Enterprise 2.0, “Either you have something good or you don’t…The rest is just spin.”

    http://twitter.com/guykawasaki/statuses/860211620

    Similarly, I’ll offer that on behalf of the general populace who need boxes and diagrams to be explained differences of then and now, I’d use one term, not two. While *I know* what you mean, Chris, comparing new media to social media, Joe Public doesn’t without a diagram, so why make the diagram? Just use one term.

    And we’re not even discussing digital media.

  47. Chris – this is one of the best (possibly THE best) description of these terms I've seen or read. This “space” is full a jargon, but also full of 'real stuff'. Sometimes a simple diagram and 300 words can explain the meaning of the 'new media' life.

    Well put, and I look forward to your commentary and insight at our upcoming conference New Marketing Summit in October! There you can help carry this same message to an eager-to-learn crowd!

    Best regards,
    Bill Sell
    CrossTech Media

  48. Chris – this is one of the best (possibly THE best) description of these terms I've seen or read. This “space” is full a jargon, but also full of 'real stuff'. Sometimes a simple diagram and 300 words can explain the meaning of the 'new media' life.

    Well put, and I look forward to your commentary and insight at our upcoming conference New Marketing Summit in October! There you can help carry this same message to an eager-to-learn crowd!

    Best regards,
    Bill Sell
    CrossTech Media

  49. Chris – this is one of the best (possibly THE best) description of these terms I’ve seen or read. This “space” is full a jargon, but also full of ‘real stuff’. Sometimes a simple diagram and 300 words can explain the meaning of the ‘new media’ life.

    Well put, and I look forward to your commentary and insight at our upcoming conference New Marketing Summit in October! There you can help carry this same message to an eager-to-learn crowd!

    Best regards,
    Bill Sell
    CrossTech Media

  50. great post. so technically, can old media be social. eg. a call in program on radio/tv ?

  51. Chris – really good explanation of the difference between old, new, and social media. Especially that social media requires social participation. Very insightful.

  52. Chris – really good explanation of the difference between old, new, and social media. Especially that social media requires social participation. Very insightful.

  53. Chris – really good explanation of the difference between old, new, and social media. Especially that social media requires social participation. Very insightful.

  54. Very interesting to see YouTube to have a very prominent position.

  55. I like this post. So many people are confused by these terms. I admit to getting confused myself. Thanks for the post because it clearly articulates the differences – you should add this to Wikipedia. (;

  56. I like this post. So many people are confused by these terms. I admit to getting confused myself. Thanks for the post because it clearly articulates the differences – you should add this to Wikipedia. (;

  57. Isha Edwards, Brand Mktg. Mgr. Avatar
    Isha Edwards, Brand Mktg. Mgr.

    Even though a dated blog, great breakdown and still relevant. When the dust finally settles between old and the current ‘new’ media, it’ll all be media as Chris advised. In the meantime, I believe it’s up to media and marketing pros to minimize the confusion by speaking the same language. Keep it simple and just use the two primary terms: old (or even traditional) and new media regardless of use.

  58. Isha Edwards, Brand Mktg. Mgr. Avatar
    Isha Edwards, Brand Mktg. Mgr.

    Even though a dated blog, great breakdown and still relevant. When the dust finally settles between old and the current ‘new’ media, it’ll all be media as Chris advised. In the meantime, I believe it’s up to media and marketing pros to minimize the confusion by speaking the same language. Keep it simple and just use the two primary terms: old (or even traditional) and new media regardless of use.

  59. Zoe, Bosnia Avatar
    Zoe, Bosnia

    Well, yes and no… I agree that people use all those terms rather loosely, or as they say in my country : they mix frogs and grandmas…
    I am just doing paper on new and social media for my college, and I am also trying to figure out the same, since there are so many terms, and there are no strict definitions. It's still a new field for the scientists – though you have number of “new” sciences emerging to research the field of information technologies and their impact…
    Anyway, what I think is that the new media can be social ( and in most cases are!) just because of the fact that by using their communication channels – anyone can produce and disseminate media content ( printed, audio or video material) , which was not the case with the traditional, “industrial” media such as : newspapers, radio, TV…

  60. Zoe, Bosnia Avatar
    Zoe, Bosnia

    Well, yes and no… I agree that people use all those terms rather loosely, or as they say in my country : they mix frogs and grandmas…
    I am just doing paper on new and social media for my college, and I am also trying to figure out the same, since there are so many terms, and there are no strict definitions. It’s still a new field for the scientists – though you have number of “new” sciences emerging to research the field of information technologies and their impact…
    Anyway, what I think is that the new media can be social ( and in most cases are!) just because of the fact that by using their communication channels – anyone can produce and disseminate media content ( printed, audio or video material) , which was not the case with the traditional, “industrial” media such as : newspapers, radio, TV…

  61. Zoe, Bosnia Avatar
    Zoe, Bosnia

    Well, yes and no… I agree that people use all those terms rather loosely, or as they say in my country : they mix frogs and grandmas…
    I am just doing paper on new and social media for my college, and I am also trying to figure out the same, since there are so many terms, and there are no strict definitions. It's still a new field for the scientists – though you have number of “new” sciences emerging to research the field of information technologies and their impact…
    Anyway, what I think is that the new media can be social ( and in most cases are!) just because of the fact that by using their communication channels – anyone can produce and disseminate media content ( printed, audio or video material) , which was not the case with the traditional, “industrial” media such as : newspapers, radio, TV…

  62. THANK YOU …about time someone declared this. i’ve always considered social media to be a sub-set of new media; having it’s own purpose … to be “social.” you did a great job of explaining it here. -j

  63. Angelo Battaglia Avatar
    Angelo Battaglia

    They are different in many ways however similar in some ways as well. I agree that social media does require participation thus making in a “social”. The so called “New” media seems to be the same as old media just in a different dressing, simply delivered in a new technology. My Question is it possible for “Old” media to reinvent itself, possible have you local news station with Twitter comments running across the bottom on a ticker as we are now so a custom to seeing on the national news channel broadcast. If a local broadcast news station respond to twitter feeds for example during the broadcast sort of creating a hybrid media outlet. does anyone see something like that happening in the future?

  64. I am not going to lie I love old media (not TV as much). I like to physical hold a newspaper or book and read. I don’t know what I would do without my morning radio show (Walton and Johnson) that I listen to everyday. Those things are lacking the ‘social’ aspect though and I love that as well. Being able to participate in news and respond definitely takes it to a whole other level.

  65. Can whatsapp also be considered as a formof social media?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This