<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The danger of the dabbler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffcutler</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4934</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffcutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4934</guid>
		<description>Good point. I had the discussion today - spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions... will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#039;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#039;re dumb?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#039;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#039;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading...but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I&#039;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#039;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I had the discussion today &#8211; spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions&#8230; will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#39;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#39;re dumb?</p>
<p>I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#39;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#39;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading&#8230;but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#39;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
<p>**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#39;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffcutler</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-6629</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffcutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-6629</guid>
		<description>Good point. I had the discussion today - spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions... will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#039;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#039;re dumb?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#039;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#039;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading...but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I&#039;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#039;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I had the discussion today &#8211; spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions&#8230; will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#39;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#39;re dumb?</p>
<p>I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#39;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#39;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading&#8230;but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#39;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
<p>**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#39;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffcutler</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4933</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffcutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4933</guid>
		<description>Good point. I had the discussion today - spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions... will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#039;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#039;re dumb?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#039;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#039;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading...but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I&#039;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#039;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I had the discussion today &#8211; spurred by your post and by the Book of Questions (or perhaps it was the Book of Stupid Questions&#8230; will look in a moment for the link and for the book in my bookcase) in which the author asks, Would you rather be really dumb, but think you&#39;re smart? Or be really smart, but think you&#39;re dumb?</p>
<p>I used to be the short-cut guy in the car until the umpteenth time I got lost and horribly late while trying to beat the system. But I&#39;ve found that abandoning a path prematurely isn&#39;t in my bailiwick. Witness a marriage that went three years too long, a 21-year journalism career (who knows where traditional reporting is heading&#8230;but the writing has been on the digital wall for at least five years), and a slew of other projects. Many which turned out great because of dedication and loyalty.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#39;m pleased to find more regular writing over here. I enjoy your show a lot and am glad to find some more fleshed out thoughts here on the blog. Keep it up.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
<p>**Found it. It was in the Book of Stupid Questions by Tom Weller. Warner Books, ISBN 0-446-38972-2 (Yes, I had it in my bookshelf. Google or Amazon should be able to find it for you if it&#39;s still in print. This was a 1988 copy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking Software</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-6630</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-6630</guid>
		<description>Excellent article Christopher! I agree with you on the points most will take away from Chris Brogan&#039;s post (I read that one as well) is GOAL GOAL GOAL. I also agree with your point of failing too fast, so many are focused on the instantaneous achievement of their goals that they keep switching lanes mid-stream ensuring that they never actually get where their going. Looking forward to more posts like this one Christopher, keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article Christopher! I agree with you on the points most will take away from Chris Brogan&#39;s post (I read that one as well) is GOAL GOAL GOAL. I also agree with your point of failing too fast, so many are focused on the instantaneous achievement of their goals that they keep switching lanes mid-stream ensuring that they never actually get where their going. Looking forward to more posts like this one Christopher, keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking Software</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>Excellent article Christopher! I agree with you on the points most will take away from Chris Brogan&#039;s post (I read that one as well) is GOAL GOAL GOAL. I also agree with your point of failing too fast, so many are focused on the instantaneous achievement of their goals that they keep switching lanes mid-stream ensuring that they never actually get where their going. Looking forward to more posts like this one Christopher, keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article Christopher! I agree with you on the points most will take away from Chris Brogan&#39;s post (I read that one as well) is GOAL GOAL GOAL. I also agree with your point of failing too fast, so many are focused on the instantaneous achievement of their goals that they keep switching lanes mid-stream ensuring that they never actually get where their going. Looking forward to more posts like this one Christopher, keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-6631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-6631</guid>
		<description>Hello Chris, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speed is sickness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I lived in the US, I felt guilty if I wasn’t doing something, always on the go. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But some things can’t be rushed, like trust, friendship, appreciation. You can’t enjoy Mozart in a rush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today in live in China. It’s mad busy. But, here’s the difference. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The expectation here is that certain things have to be done slowly. Ever been to a dinner with Chinese-business men? There’s a reason it lasts 4 or 5 hours. They want to see who really you are… after you’ve had a few drinks and loosened up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like another person said on CBs site, the golden mean is balance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many people are driving 100 mph down an alleyway. Sometimes it’s good to pause for a moment and size things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chris, </p>
<p>Speed is sickness.</p>
<p>When I lived in the US, I felt guilty if I wasn’t doing something, always on the go. </p>
<p>But some things can’t be rushed, like trust, friendship, appreciation. You can’t enjoy Mozart in a rush.</p>
<p>Today in live in China. It’s mad busy. But, here’s the difference. </p>
<p>The expectation here is that certain things have to be done slowly. Ever been to a dinner with Chinese-business men? There’s a reason it lasts 4 or 5 hours. They want to see who really you are… after you’ve had a few drinks and loosened up. </p>
<p>Like another person said on CBs site, the golden mean is balance. </p>
<p>Many people are driving 100 mph down an alleyway. Sometimes it’s good to pause for a moment and size things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dunning-Kruger Effect &#38; How To Fail Slowly &#124; IvanWalsh.com - Learn How To Run Your Business Online</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dunning-Kruger Effect &#38; How To Fail Slowly &#124; IvanWalsh.com - Learn How To Run Your Business Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>[...] Penn discussed the Dunning-Kruger effect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Penn discussed the Dunning-Kruger effect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>Hello Chris, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speed is sickness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I lived in the US, I felt guilty if I wasn’t doing something, always on the go. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But some things can’t be rushed, like trust, friendship, appreciation. You can’t enjoy Mozart in a rush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today in live in China. It’s mad busy. But, here’s the difference. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The expectation here is that certain things have to be done slowly. Ever been to a dinner with Chinese-business men? There’s a reason it lasts 4 or 5 hours. They want to see who really you are… after you’ve had a few drinks and loosened up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like another person said on CBs site, the golden mean is balance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many people are driving 100 mph down an alleyway. Sometimes it’s good to pause for a moment and size things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chris, </p>
<p>Speed is sickness.</p>
<p>When I lived in the US, I felt guilty if I wasn’t doing something, always on the go. </p>
<p>But some things can’t be rushed, like trust, friendship, appreciation. You can’t enjoy Mozart in a rush.</p>
<p>Today in live in China. It’s mad busy. But, here’s the difference. </p>
<p>The expectation here is that certain things have to be done slowly. Ever been to a dinner with Chinese-business men? There’s a reason it lasts 4 or 5 hours. They want to see who really you are… after you’ve had a few drinks and loosened up. </p>
<p>Like another person said on CBs site, the golden mean is balance. </p>
<p>Many people are driving 100 mph down an alleyway. Sometimes it’s good to pause for a moment and size things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravity</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>Nice angle, and the point about shortcuts in traffic is valid indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice angle, and the point about shortcuts in traffic is valid indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravity</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2010/02/the-danger-of-the-dabbler/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=1507#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>Nice angle, and the point about shortcuts in traffic is valid indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice angle, and the point about shortcuts in traffic is valid indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

