Comments on: The eye of the storm http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Single Olga http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-13338 Single Olga Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:45:00 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-13338 Very interesting! I am unfamiliar with the concept of mortgage rate resets but I would like to learn about it as much as possible. I hope your blog will help me. Thank you for sharing this information. I will tell my friends about it so that we could discuss it. Very interesting! I am unfamiliar with the concept of mortgage rate resets but I would like to learn about it as much as possible. I hope your blog will help me. Thank you for sharing this information. I will tell my friends about it so that we could discuss it.

]]> By: Daniel Johnson, Jr. http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3732 Daniel Johnson, Jr. Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:55:40 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3732 Gulp! Gulp!

]]> By: Daniel Johnson, Jr. http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-6944 Daniel Johnson, Jr. Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:55:40 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-6944 Gulp! Gulp!

]]> By: Rian http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3733 Rian Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:06:33 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3733 Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?<br><br>Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.<br><br>Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription. Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?

Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.

Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription.

]]> By: Rian http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-6945 Rian Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:06:33 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-6945 Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?<br><br>Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.<br><br>Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription. Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?

Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.

Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription.

]]> By: Daniel Johnson, Jr. http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3725 Daniel Johnson, Jr. Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:55:40 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3725 Gulp! Gulp!

]]> By: Daniel Johnson, Jr. http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3726 Daniel Johnson, Jr. Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:55:40 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3726 Gulp! Gulp!

]]> By: Daniel Johnson, Jr. http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3731 Daniel Johnson, Jr. Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:55:40 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3731 Gulp! Gulp!

]]> By: Rian http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3724 Rian Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:06:33 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3724 Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?<br><br>Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.<br><br>Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription. Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?

Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.

Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription.

]]> By: Rian http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/06/the-eye-of-the-storm/#comment-3730 Rian Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:06:33 +0000 http://www.christopherspenn.com/?p=891#comment-3730 Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?<br><br>Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.<br><br>Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription. Batten down the hatches and tighten spending? Therefore making worse the paradox of thrift?

Er, no thanks. What we need is more organic consumer spending (as opposed to debt spending). The rate of US savings is up (around 5%, I believe), and cutting back on consumer spending is only going to exacerbate the problems in the real economy (which is slowly beginning to recover). We can destroy that progress in the real economy by cutting back spending.

Needless to say, I disagree with your prescription.

]]>