<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama: A Digital New Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2946</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2946</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5781</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5781</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5787</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5787</guid>
		<description>At the White House, the party committees provide the extra pagers, computers, and cell phones. House and Senate members typically go to party offices to use those resources for campaign purposes, but that isn&#039;t particularly practical for presidential aides. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t speak to how they handle it at state/local level, though even there they would need some way to make fundraising and other campaign calls, emails, etc. without using governmental resources. In most cases, I imagine they could simply go off-site, but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to know many larger states/municipalities might have aides who carry political phones in addition to anything issued by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the White House, the party committees provide the extra pagers, computers, and cell phones. House and Senate members typically go to party offices to use those resources for campaign purposes, but that isn&#39;t particularly practical for presidential aides. </p>
<p>I can&#39;t speak to how they handle it at state/local level, though even there they would need some way to make fundraising and other campaign calls, emails, etc. without using governmental resources. In most cases, I imagine they could simply go off-site, but I wouldn&#39;t be surprised to know many larger states/municipalities might have aides who carry political phones in addition to anything issued by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher S. Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-13168</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-13168</guid>
		<description>Approve

Sent from a mobile device - please excuse brevity &amp; typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Approve</p>
<p>Sent from a mobile device &#8211; please excuse brevity &amp; typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5786</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5786</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree with you on paperwork, Chip. Looking back, I see my concern was with your designation of dual cellphones, pagers, computers, etc for government staff. While any employing agency would typically provide a computer workstation, I&#039;ve never heard of state cabinet secretaries or mayors receiving separate cellphones. Usually, the enterprise server is made accessible on the personal phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree with you on paperwork, Chip. Looking back, I see my concern was with your designation of dual cellphones, pagers, computers, etc for government staff. While any employing agency would typically provide a computer workstation, I&#39;ve never heard of state cabinet secretaries or mayors receiving separate cellphones. Usually, the enterprise server is made accessible on the personal phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2944</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2944</guid>
		<description>At the White House, the party committees provide the extra pagers, computers, and cell phones. House and Senate members typically go to party offices to use those resources for campaign purposes, but that isn&#039;t particularly practical for presidential aides. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t speak to how they handle it at state/local level, though even there they would need some way to make fundraising and other campaign calls, emails, etc. without using governmental resources. In most cases, I imagine they could simply go off-site, but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to know many larger states/municipalities might have aides who carry political phones in addition to anything issued by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the White House, the party committees provide the extra pagers, computers, and cell phones. House and Senate members typically go to party offices to use those resources for campaign purposes, but that isn&#39;t particularly practical for presidential aides. </p>
<p>I can&#39;t speak to how they handle it at state/local level, though even there they would need some way to make fundraising and other campaign calls, emails, etc. without using governmental resources. In most cases, I imagine they could simply go off-site, but I wouldn&#39;t be surprised to know many larger states/municipalities might have aides who carry political phones in addition to anything issued by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree with you on paperwork, Chip. Looking back, I see my concern was with your designation of dual cellphones, pagers, computers, etc for government staff. While any employing agency would typically provide a computer workstation, I&#039;ve never heard of state cabinet secretaries or mayors receiving separate cellphones. Usually, the enterprise server is made accessible on the personal phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree with you on paperwork, Chip. Looking back, I see my concern was with your designation of dual cellphones, pagers, computers, etc for government staff. While any employing agency would typically provide a computer workstation, I&#39;ve never heard of state cabinet secretaries or mayors receiving separate cellphones. Usually, the enterprise server is made accessible on the personal phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon burg</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>jon burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>Love the dialogue.  I posted some considerations yesterday over here - would love to get your thoughts - &lt;a href=&quot;http://jburg.typepad.com/future/2008/11/where-vision-meets-reality-obamas-conundrum.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jburg.typepad.com/future/2008/11/where-v...&lt;/a&gt; - think it would be a real game changer if Obama citizen democratized the executive office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the dialogue.  I posted some considerations yesterday over here &#8211; would love to get your thoughts &#8211; <a href="http://jburg.typepad.com/future/2008/11/where-vision-meets-reality-obamas-conundrum.html" rel="nofollow">http://jburg.typepad.com/future/2008/11/where-v&#8230;</a> &#8211; think it would be a real game changer if Obama citizen democratized the executive office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5785</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/11/05/president-obama-a-digital-new-deal/#comment-5785</guid>
		<description>Ari, I have only worked in federal politics, but my general knowledge of the rules at state and local levels are that they too would preclude the use of government resources for political purposes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a specific example, when I worked on Capitol Hill years ago, we had a database of people who had written letters the the Congressman I worked for. We could contact them for official purposes, but we could not then pass it on to the campaign during election season. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama could likely transfer the list INTO the government, but he could not then take an updated list back out for the 2012 campaign. The more likely scenario is that the list will be maintained for political purposes. The Obama campaign and the DNC can advocate on behalf of the President&#039;s policies, so the communications can be unfettered (for the most part) and parallel what his Administration is saying. Of course, that would be a harder list to grow for non-partisan communications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari, I have only worked in federal politics, but my general knowledge of the rules at state and local levels are that they too would preclude the use of government resources for political purposes. </p>
<p>As a specific example, when I worked on Capitol Hill years ago, we had a database of people who had written letters the the Congressman I worked for. We could contact them for official purposes, but we could not then pass it on to the campaign during election season. </p>
<p>Obama could likely transfer the list INTO the government, but he could not then take an updated list back out for the 2012 campaign. The more likely scenario is that the list will be maintained for political purposes. The Obama campaign and the DNC can advocate on behalf of the President&#39;s policies, so the communications can be unfettered (for the most part) and parallel what his Administration is saying. Of course, that would be a harder list to grow for non-partisan communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

