<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:47:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: goldiekatsu</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-3186</link>
		<dc:creator>goldiekatsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/#comment-3186</guid>
		<description>Of course a bird with no wings would be a kiwi...or a dodo.  We need all 3 parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course a bird with no wings would be a kiwi&#8230;or a dodo.  We need all 3 parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher S. Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s actually the way it used to be done in the earliest elections. The president was whoever won, and the vice president was the runner up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Compromise and cooperation were far more valued back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s actually the way it used to be done in the earliest elections. The president was whoever won, and the vice president was the runner up.</p>
<p>Compromise and cooperation were far more valued back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/09/01/thoughts-on-politics/#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>More food for thought: If the executive branch is the left and the legislative branch is the right, the judiciary remains in the middle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you suggesting a presidential candidate should be paired with a vice presidential candidate of a different platform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More food for thought: If the executive branch is the left and the legislative branch is the right, the judiciary remains in the middle.</p>
<p>Are you suggesting a presidential candidate should be paired with a vice presidential candidate of a different platform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
