<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Media Realty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Actually, a very interesting take on a different way of selling. Sounds and looks like a pre-sell of the property, although I understand your intentions and different take on making potential customers try to find a connection that might pull at their emotions in making a decision. I&#039;m not sure how many agents would actually make such an effort though, except perhaps the house owners themselves. Most agents would want to make as fast a sale as possible given the opportunity, and they go for quantity rather than an (emotional) quality, methinks. (but Kelly&#039;s sharing of some of the laws and rules are very eye-opening as well) I&#039;m not an expert at any length on this, but your take is definitely very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a very interesting take on a different way of selling. Sounds and looks like a pre-sell of the property, although I understand your intentions and different take on making potential customers try to find a connection that might pull at their emotions in making a decision. I&#8217;m not sure how many agents would actually make such an effort though, except perhaps the house owners themselves. Most agents would want to make as fast a sale as possible given the opportunity, and they go for quantity rather than an (emotional) quality, methinks. (but Kelly&#8217;s sharing of some of the laws and rules are very eye-opening as well) I&#8217;m not an expert at any length on this, but your take is definitely very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>Actually, a very interesting take on a different way of selling. Sounds and looks like a pre-sell of the property, although I understand your intentions and different take on making potential customers try to find a connection that might pull at their emotions in making a decision. I&#039;m not sure how many agents would actually make such an effort though, except perhaps the house owners themselves. Most agents would want to make as fast a sale as possible given the opportunity, and they go for quantity rather than an (emotional) quality, methinks. (but Kelly&#039;s sharing of some of the laws and rules are very eye-opening as well) I&#039;m not an expert at any length on this, but your take is definitely very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a very interesting take on a different way of selling. Sounds and looks like a pre-sell of the property, although I understand your intentions and different take on making potential customers try to find a connection that might pull at their emotions in making a decision. I&#8217;m not sure how many agents would actually make such an effort though, except perhaps the house owners themselves. Most agents would want to make as fast a sale as possible given the opportunity, and they go for quantity rather than an (emotional) quality, methinks. (but Kelly&#8217;s sharing of some of the laws and rules are very eye-opening as well) I&#8217;m not an expert at any length on this, but your take is definitely very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate New Media Style</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate New Media Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Penn wrote about this last week and it has had my mind wondering for a while about it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Penn wrote about this last week and it has had my mind wondering for a while about it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle Sparta</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle Sparta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>To the best of my knowledge (and I am by no means an expert on Fair Housing Legislation), I believe that all of the restrictions apply to both agents and sellers.

You, on the other hand, are neither (unless you own an interest in the property).  Although, with it being your parents, you could be said to be working for them and by association as a contractor and you might get in trouble too.  This is one of those sticky issues - being very un-PC to violate it and therefore potentially open to lawsuits.  I&#039;d avoid.

Here are the protected classes in Massachusetts (some vary from state to state).

Race, religion, creed, national origin, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, and handicap status.  I may have forgotten one in there too - perhaps marital status(it&#039;s been a while since I had to list these off).  I&#039;m sure if you google Fair Housing and Massachusetts, you could find a comprehensive list.  It&#039;s a real hot button topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the best of my knowledge (and I am by no means an expert on Fair Housing Legislation), I believe that all of the restrictions apply to both agents and sellers.</p>
<p>You, on the other hand, are neither (unless you own an interest in the property).  Although, with it being your parents, you could be said to be working for them and by association as a contractor and you might get in trouble too.  This is one of those sticky issues &#8211; being very un-PC to violate it and therefore potentially open to lawsuits.  I&#8217;d avoid.</p>
<p>Here are the protected classes in Massachusetts (some vary from state to state).</p>
<p>Race, religion, creed, national origin, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, and handicap status.  I may have forgotten one in there too &#8211; perhaps marital status(it&#8217;s been a while since I had to list these off).  I&#8217;m sure if you google Fair Housing and Massachusetts, you could find a comprehensive list.  It&#8217;s a real hot button topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle Sparta</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-12448</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle Sparta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-12448</guid>
		<description>To the best of my knowledge (and I am by no means an expert on Fair Housing Legislation), I believe that all of the restrictions apply to both agents and sellers.  

You, on the other hand, are neither (unless you own an interest in the property).  Although, with it being your parents, you could be said to be working for them and by association as a contractor and you might get in trouble too.  This is one of those sticky issues - being very un-PC to violate it and therefore potentially open to lawsuits.  I&#039;d avoid. 

Here are the protected classes in Massachusetts (some vary from state to state).  

Race, religion, creed, national origin, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, and handicap status.  I may have forgotten one in there too - perhaps marital status(it&#039;s been a while since I had to list these off).  I&#039;m sure if you google Fair Housing and Massachusetts, you could find a comprehensive list.  It&#039;s a real hot button topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the best of my knowledge (and I am by no means an expert on Fair Housing Legislation), I believe that all of the restrictions apply to both agents and sellers.  </p>
<p>You, on the other hand, are neither (unless you own an interest in the property).  Although, with it being your parents, you could be said to be working for them and by association as a contractor and you might get in trouble too.  This is one of those sticky issues &#8211; being very un-PC to violate it and therefore potentially open to lawsuits.  I&#8217;d avoid. </p>
<p>Here are the protected classes in Massachusetts (some vary from state to state).  </p>
<p>Race, religion, creed, national origin, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, and handicap status.  I may have forgotten one in there too &#8211; perhaps marital status(it&#8217;s been a while since I had to list these off).  I&#8217;m sure if you google Fair Housing and Massachusetts, you could find a comprehensive list.  It&#8217;s a real hot button topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher S. Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Kelle - interesting! So if a house is for sale through an agent, does that mean the seller can market the things that the agent cannot? Or in this case, I can market the things that the agent cannot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelle &#8211; interesting! So if a house is for sale through an agent, does that mean the seller can market the things that the agent cannot? Or in this case, I can market the things that the agent cannot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher S. Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-12447</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-12447</guid>
		<description>Kelle - interesting! So if a house is for sale through an agent, does that mean the seller can market the things that the agent cannot? Or in this case, I can market the things that the agent cannot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelle &#8211; interesting! So if a house is for sale through an agent, does that mean the seller can market the things that the agent cannot? Or in this case, I can market the things that the agent cannot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle Sparta</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle Sparta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Dear Christopher,

A broker&#039;s open house is not designed to bring buyers in on that day - it is a day to showcase the house for local agents.  Why?  Because agents tend to show the houses they know first, since they know what to expect.  This is actually a MUCH more effective marketing tool than a regular open house (only 1-2% of houses nationally sell on an open house).

As for agents&#039; write-ups being less than stellar, there&#039;s a challenge that agents face that no one is aware of.  It&#039;s called Fair Housing legislation.  It&#039;s designed to keep agents from discriminating against certain protected classes, but in practice, it is the cause for all of the lackluster marketing.  We can&#039;t say &quot;great for family get-togethers&quot; since that would be discrimination on the basis of familial status.  We can&#039;t even say &quot;walk to th local orthodox synagogue&quot; (even though that would be a major selling point for a certain population of people) because it is a violation of both religion and handicap status (if you&#039;re in a wheelchair, you can&#039;t walk).  It&#039;s insane.

When it comes to effectively presenting some of the most marketable items (great schools, local religious facilities, etc.) or stating the obvious (great for a single person (because it&#039;s too small for two), our hands are tied.

I agree that it is a frustrating thing.  Agents have complained about it for years.  Some are even disregarding the most ridiculous aspects, but they do so at their own peril.  It&#039;s an $11,000 fine per occurance if they get caught.

My suggestion for the best use of today&#039;s technology?  I&#039;d say have the agent do an interview with the sellers and podcast it out on their website and put it on their &quot;Talking House&quot; broadcaster.  If the agent is smart, they&#039;ll create a regular podcast - perhaps even for their whole office.  (This would be a great service for Brokers to offer for their agents.)  That way it gets regular hits.

The fact is, that the more you can make buyers feel good about a home and the sellers, the greater is the likelihood that they will buy it.  Real estate is ultimately an emotional decision rationalized by logic.  Get the emotion on your side and (barring any other major problems), you&#039;ve likely got a sale.

Kelle Sparta is a Speaker, Author and Coach for the real estate industry.  She is the author of The Consultative Real Estate Agent.  For more information, you can find her on the web at www.spartasuccess.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Christopher,</p>
<p>A broker&#8217;s open house is not designed to bring buyers in on that day &#8211; it is a day to showcase the house for local agents.  Why?  Because agents tend to show the houses they know first, since they know what to expect.  This is actually a MUCH more effective marketing tool than a regular open house (only 1-2% of houses nationally sell on an open house).</p>
<p>As for agents&#8217; write-ups being less than stellar, there&#8217;s a challenge that agents face that no one is aware of.  It&#8217;s called Fair Housing legislation.  It&#8217;s designed to keep agents from discriminating against certain protected classes, but in practice, it is the cause for all of the lackluster marketing.  We can&#8217;t say &#8220;great for family get-togethers&#8221; since that would be discrimination on the basis of familial status.  We can&#8217;t even say &#8220;walk to th local orthodox synagogue&#8221; (even though that would be a major selling point for a certain population of people) because it is a violation of both religion and handicap status (if you&#8217;re in a wheelchair, you can&#8217;t walk).  It&#8217;s insane.</p>
<p>When it comes to effectively presenting some of the most marketable items (great schools, local religious facilities, etc.) or stating the obvious (great for a single person (because it&#8217;s too small for two), our hands are tied.</p>
<p>I agree that it is a frustrating thing.  Agents have complained about it for years.  Some are even disregarding the most ridiculous aspects, but they do so at their own peril.  It&#8217;s an $11,000 fine per occurance if they get caught.</p>
<p>My suggestion for the best use of today&#8217;s technology?  I&#8217;d say have the agent do an interview with the sellers and podcast it out on their website and put it on their &#8220;Talking House&#8221; broadcaster.  If the agent is smart, they&#8217;ll create a regular podcast &#8211; perhaps even for their whole office.  (This would be a great service for Brokers to offer for their agents.)  That way it gets regular hits.</p>
<p>The fact is, that the more you can make buyers feel good about a home and the sellers, the greater is the likelihood that they will buy it.  Real estate is ultimately an emotional decision rationalized by logic.  Get the emotion on your side and (barring any other major problems), you&#8217;ve likely got a sale.</p>
<p>Kelle Sparta is a Speaker, Author and Coach for the real estate industry.  She is the author of The Consultative Real Estate Agent.  For more information, you can find her on the web at <a href="http://www.spartasuccess.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spartasuccess.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle Sparta</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-12449</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle Sparta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-12449</guid>
		<description>Dear Christopher,

A broker&#039;s open house is not designed to bring buyers in on that day - it is a day to showcase the house for local agents.  Why?  Because agents tend to show the houses they know first, since they know what to expect.  This is actually a MUCH more effective marketing tool than a regular open house (only 1-2% of houses nationally sell on an open house).  

As for agents&#039; write-ups being less than stellar, there&#039;s a challenge that agents face that no one is aware of.  It&#039;s called Fair Housing legislation.  It&#039;s designed to keep agents from discriminating against certain protected classes, but in practice, it is the cause for all of the lackluster marketing.  We can&#039;t say &quot;great for family get-togethers&quot; since that would be discrimination on the basis of familial status.  We can&#039;t even say &quot;walk to th local orthodox synagogue&quot; (even though that would be a major selling point for a certain population of people) because it is a violation of both religion and handicap status (if you&#039;re in a wheelchair, you can&#039;t walk).  It&#039;s insane.  

When it comes to effectively presenting some of the most marketable items (great schools, local religious facilities, etc.) or stating the obvious (great for a single person (because it&#039;s too small for two), our hands are tied.  

I agree that it is a frustrating thing.  Agents have complained about it for years.  Some are even disregarding the most ridiculous aspects, but they do so at their own peril.  It&#039;s an $11,000 fine per occurance if they get caught.

My suggestion for the best use of today&#039;s technology?  I&#039;d say have the agent do an interview with the sellers and podcast it out on their website and put it on their &quot;Talking House&quot; broadcaster.  If the agent is smart, they&#039;ll create a regular podcast - perhaps even for their whole office.  (This would be a great service for Brokers to offer for their agents.)  That way it gets regular hits.

The fact is, that the more you can make buyers feel good about a home and the sellers, the greater is the likelihood that they will buy it.  Real estate is ultimately an emotional decision rationalized by logic.  Get the emotion on your side and (barring any other major problems), you&#039;ve likely got a sale.

Kelle Sparta is a Speaker, Author and Coach for the real estate industry.  She is the author of The Consultative Real Estate Agent.  For more information, you can find her on the web at www.spartasuccess.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Christopher,</p>
<p>A broker&#8217;s open house is not designed to bring buyers in on that day &#8211; it is a day to showcase the house for local agents.  Why?  Because agents tend to show the houses they know first, since they know what to expect.  This is actually a MUCH more effective marketing tool than a regular open house (only 1-2% of houses nationally sell on an open house).  </p>
<p>As for agents&#8217; write-ups being less than stellar, there&#8217;s a challenge that agents face that no one is aware of.  It&#8217;s called Fair Housing legislation.  It&#8217;s designed to keep agents from discriminating against certain protected classes, but in practice, it is the cause for all of the lackluster marketing.  We can&#8217;t say &#8220;great for family get-togethers&#8221; since that would be discrimination on the basis of familial status.  We can&#8217;t even say &#8220;walk to th local orthodox synagogue&#8221; (even though that would be a major selling point for a certain population of people) because it is a violation of both religion and handicap status (if you&#8217;re in a wheelchair, you can&#8217;t walk).  It&#8217;s insane.  </p>
<p>When it comes to effectively presenting some of the most marketable items (great schools, local religious facilities, etc.) or stating the obvious (great for a single person (because it&#8217;s too small for two), our hands are tied.  </p>
<p>I agree that it is a frustrating thing.  Agents have complained about it for years.  Some are even disregarding the most ridiculous aspects, but they do so at their own peril.  It&#8217;s an $11,000 fine per occurance if they get caught.</p>
<p>My suggestion for the best use of today&#8217;s technology?  I&#8217;d say have the agent do an interview with the sellers and podcast it out on their website and put it on their &#8220;Talking House&#8221; broadcaster.  If the agent is smart, they&#8217;ll create a regular podcast &#8211; perhaps even for their whole office.  (This would be a great service for Brokers to offer for their agents.)  That way it gets regular hits.</p>
<p>The fact is, that the more you can make buyers feel good about a home and the sellers, the greater is the likelihood that they will buy it.  Real estate is ultimately an emotional decision rationalized by logic.  Get the emotion on your side and (barring any other major problems), you&#8217;ve likely got a sale.</p>
<p>Kelle Sparta is a Speaker, Author and Coach for the real estate industry.  She is the author of The Consultative Real Estate Agent.  For more information, you can find her on the web at <a href="http://www.spartasuccess.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spartasuccess.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher S. Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/new-media-realty/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/05/08/new-media-realty/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Andy - what other new tools would you use? My parents mentioned that their agent had a broker&#039;s open house and all they got for their trouble was 25 people leaving footprints everywhere, and no prospective buyers. Do realtors post to Craigslist, open up MySpace pages, etc.? What other capabilities are on YOUR radar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; what other new tools would you use? My parents mentioned that their agent had a broker&#8217;s open house and all they got for their trouble was 25 people leaving footprints everywhere, and no prospective buyers. Do realtors post to Craigslist, open up MySpace pages, etc.? What other capabilities are on YOUR radar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

